Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Indic Res. 2016 Jan 25;132(1):219–239. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1244-2

Table 4.

Associations between Socioeconomic Status in 2010 and Self-Rated Health in 2012 among Chinese Adults (18–70 years old; N = 17,877)

HOPIT
Ordered Probit Unscaled Scaled
Age (Ref: 61–70)
   18–30   1.04*** (0.04)   1.44*** (0.05) 1.14
   31–40   0.69*** (0.03)   1.01*** (0.04) 0.80
   41–50   0.43*** (0.03)   0.67*** (0.04) 0.54
   51–60   0.16*** (0.03)   0.29*** (0.04) 0.23
Male (Ref: female)   0.16*** (0.02)   0.31*** (0.03) 0.24
Marital status (Ref: married)
   Single   0.12** (0.03)   0.12** (0.05) 0.09
   Divorced/Widowed −0.07 (0.04) −0.02 (0.06) −0.01
Education (Ref: none)
   Primary school   0.02 (0.03)   0.09* (0.04) 0.07
   Junior high school   0.10** (0.03)   0.26*** (0.04) 0.20
   Senior high school or above   0.04 (0.04)   0.11* (0.05) 0.09
Verbal test   0.00 (0.00)   0.00 (0.00) 0.00
Annual family income per capita (logged)   0.03** (0.01)   0.04** (0.01) 0.03
Family wealth (percentile scaled to 0–1)   0.25*** (0.04)   0.42*** (0.05) 0.34
Family cadre/party member (Ref: no)   0.05** (0.02)   0.07** (0.03) 0.06
Urban (Ref: rural) −0.06** (0.02) −0.10*** (0.03) −0.08
Smoking (Ref: no)   0.03 (0.02)   0.03 (0.03) 0.03
Drinking alcohol (Ref: no)   0.16*** (0.02)   0.21*** (0.03) 0.17
Physical exercise (Ref: no)   0.06** (0.02)   0.08** (0.02) 0.06
County GDP per capita (logged)   0.00 (0.01) −0.01 (0.02) −0.01
Constant     — −2.76*** (0.17) −2.20
Σ     —   1.26*** (0.01)
Regional fixed effects Yes Yes

Notes: Ref = reference. Self-rated health is coded as 1 = poor; 2 = fair; 3 = good; 4 = very good; and 5 = excellent. Robust standard errors that adjust for individuals clustered within families are shown in parentheses.

*

p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.01;

***

p < 0.001.