Table 3.
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
---|---|---|---|
Attitudes towards fatherhood | 0.11*** (0.03) | 0.08** (0.03) | 0.07* (0.03) |
Importance of financial support | 0.04 (0.06) | 0.06 (0.06) | |
Importance of direct care | -0.02 (0.07) | 0.00 (0.07) | |
Involvement by father’s father | 0.03 (0.03) | 0.00 (0.03) | |
Cohabiting with mothera | 0.30*** (0.05) | 0.27*** (0.05) | |
Married to mothera | 0.54*** (0.06) | 0.46*** (0.07) | |
Child’s mother expects to work | 0.10† (0.06) | ||
Father has other children | -0.06 (0.05) | ||
Father’s age | 0.00 (0.00) | ||
Blackb | -0.12* (0.06) | ||
Latino/Hispanicb | 0.04 (0.06) | ||
Other raceb | 0.07 (0.11) | ||
Less than high schoolc | -0.02 (0.06) | ||
Some collegec | 0.11† (0.06) | ||
College or higherc | 0.15† (0.08) | ||
Income (logarithmic) | 0.03 (0.03) |
p<0.1
p<0.05
p<0.01
p <0 .001
Notes: b coefficients are presented. Standard errors are in parentheses.
Reference group is “Non-resident father”
Reference group is “White”
Reference group is “High school”