Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 7;12(7):e0180028. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180028

Fig 1. Preconditioning with CoCl2 is more effective than intermittent clamping (IC).

Fig 1

(A) Experimental design for the in vivo study comparing the ability of different preconditioning techniques to protect against IRI in rats. (B) Animal sickness scores in rats treated with saline (control) (●), 30 mg/kg CoCl2 (■), IC (⬢) or IC + CoCl2 (▲). (C) Serum creatinine concentrations (mean ± SEM (µmol/L)). The rise in serum creatinine was less in rats preconditioned with 30 mg/kg CoCl2 than in the saline control group. (D) Serum urea concentrations (mean ± SEM (mmol/L)). *p<0.05 Vs saline treated control.