Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2016 May 27;51(4):454–462. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.03.025

Table 3.

Patient-Reported Communication and Decision-Making Outcomes in Intervention Versus Control Participants

Intervention (n=131) Control (n=131) Adjusted differencea
Knowledgeb
 Baseline 2.6 2.5
 Follow-up 4.6 2.8 1.8 (1.5, 2.1)***
Screening discussion
 Any discussion 71.0% 45.0% 26.1% (14.3%, 38.0%)***
 FOBT only 29.8% 13.7%
 Colonoscopy only 15.3% 18.3%
 Both tests 24.4% 8.4%
 “Not sure which test” 1.5% 4.6%
 None 29.0% 55.0%
Intent to be screenedc
 Baseline 70.2% 71.8%
 Follow-up 93.1% 84.7% 9.0% (2.0%, 16.0%)*
Test preference
 Any preference 93.1% 68.0% 26.5% (17.2% 35.8%)***
 FOBT 67.1% 45.8%
  Colonoscopy 26.0% 22.2%
  “Haven’t decided which test” 3.8% 10.7%
  “Don’t have enough information to decide” 3.1% 21.4%
Test ordering
 Any test ordered 56.5% 32.1% 25.8% (14.4%, 37.2%)***
 FOBT only 35.9% 18.3%
 Colonoscopy only 17.6% 13.0%
 Both tests 3.0% 0.8%
 None 43.5% 67.9%
a

All comparisons control for provider; comparisons for knowledge and intent also control for baseline. Boldface indicates statistical significance (*p<0.05; **p<0.001; ***p<0.001).

b

Mean number of correct responses out of six items.

c

Higher intent to be screened (strongly agree/agree) versus lower (strongly disagree/disagree/neutral).

FOBT, fecal occult blood testing.