Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 5;118(1):363–373. doi: 10.1152/jn.00813.2016

Table 1.

Participant demographics

Age, yr Sex Height, m Mass, kg PD Duration, yr UPDRS-III H&Y CBF PD Phenotype Medications
PR1 68 M 1.8 80.6 5 26 2 24 PIGD (0.14/1.00) C/L, Ent, Rop
PR2 79 M 1.68 68.0 3 40 2 19 PIGD (0.57/1.00) C/L, Ama
PR3 64 M 1.75 79.3 11 25 2.5 20 PIGD (0.00/0.50) C/L, Ent
PR7 36 M 1.83 74.7 6 29 2 24 TD (1.71/0.00) C/L
PR8 81 F 1.65 48.9 14 31 3 22 PIGD (0.00/0/50 C/L, Rop
PR9 56 M 1.85 82.9 3 28 2 22 Indet (0.71/0.50) C/L

PD, Parkinson’s disease; UPDRS-III, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Motor Subscale III; H&Y, Hoehn and Yahr scale; PIGD, postural instability/gait disability dominant; TD, tremor dominant; Indet, indeterminate C/L, carbidopa/levodopa; Ent, entacapone; Rop, ropinerole; Ama, amantadine. Physical function reported with composite physical function (Rikli and Jones 1999). PD phenotype presented as the ratio of average scores on UPDRS-III for posture and gait items/tremor items. Participant codes are as in McKay et al. (2016).