Table 4. Impact of Semiotic Icon Type by Health Literacy Score.
Perfect health literacy | Lower health literacy | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F value |
|
F value |
|
|||
Addiction | ||||||
| ||||||
Perceived representation | 618 | .63 | 349 | .51 | ||
Affect | 308 | .46 | 89 | .21 | ||
Cognitive elaboration | 572 | .61 | 359 | .52 | ||
Perceived effectiveness | 470 | .57 | 294 | .47 | ||
| ||||||
Heart attack and stroke | ||||||
| ||||||
Perceived representation | 92.59 | .20 | 53 | .14 | ||
Cognitive elaboration | 97.91 | .21 | 64 | .16 | ||
| ||||||
Permanent breathing problems | ||||||
| ||||||
Perceived representation | 71.09 | .17 | 26 | .07 | ||
Affect | 71.62 | .17 | 21 | .06 | ||
Cognitive elaboration | 92.49 | .20 | 25 | .07 | ||
Perceived effectiveness | 91.71 | .20 | 31 | .09 |
Note. Table shows effect sizes for the 10 of 25 analyses where icon type interacted with health literacy. All F values for RM MANOVAs and univariate analyses are significant at p < .001.