Skip to main content
. 2017 May 19;54(8):2279–2287. doi: 10.1007/s13197-017-2665-x

Table 2.

Effect of processing on β-glucan and macronutrient levels

Parameters Processing D1 D2 F1 F2
β-Glucan Raw grain 1.4 ± 0.1Aa 1.5 ± 0.1Aa 1.8 ± 0.1Ba 1.9 ± 0.2Ba
Dehulled groat 2.1 ± 0.3b 1.8 ± 0.1b 2.1 ± 0.4a 2.3 ± 0.2a
Flour 2.8 ± 0.3c 2.9 ± 0.4c 3.2 ± 0.4b 3.1 ± 0.5b
Protein Raw grain 11.8 ± 0.2Aa 11.5 ± 0.1Aa 11.8 ± 0.1Aa 12.1 ± 0.2Aa
Dehulled groat 11.6 ± 0.2a 11.4 ± 0.1a 11.6 ± 0.3a 12.0 ± 0.2a
Flour 11.0 ± 0.2b 10.8 ± 0.2b 10.8 ± 0.1b 11.3 ± 0.3b
Total dietary fiber Raw grain 35.2 ± 0.3Aa 38.2 ± 0.2Ba 37.0 ± 0.6Ca 37.8 ± 0.3BCa
Dehulled groat 15.5 ± 0.1b 14.3 ± 0.1b 14.6 ± 0.2b 15.3 ± 0.1b
Flour 13.4 ± 0.1c 11.9 ± 0.2c 12.2 ± 0.2c 13.1 ± 0.3c
Starch Raw grain 21.4 ± 1.8Aa 21.1 ± 1.5Aa 22.8 ± 1.7Aa 23.1 ± 1.9Aa
Dehulled groat 40.3 ± 3.2b 40.9 ± 2.9b 42.7 ± 3.8b 41.1 ± 3.0b
Flour 59.8 ± 4.1c 60.1 ± 4.4c 61.2 ± 4.0c 59.3 ± 4.8c

Each value is shown as mean ± standard deviation and is expressed as  %, on dry weight

D1 cv. Donata in loamy soil, D2 cv. Donata in medium texture soil, F1 cv. Flavia in loamy soil, F2 cv. Flavia in medium texture soil

A–C Values with different capital letters in the same row indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) with respect to genotype (D1 vs. F1; D2 vs. F2) or soil type (D1 vs. D2; F1 vs. F2)

a–c Values with different lower case letters in the same column, for each parameter, indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) along the processing chain