Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Vision Res. 2017 Jan 9;141:181–190. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.12.013

Table 3.

Comparison of Pearson’s correlation coefficients for inter-eye position, for CFL and control participants, for all three viewing conditions; p-values in bold represent significant difference in correlation coefficient means.

Horizontal Component Vertical Component
Vel Factor Condition Mean F-stat p-value ηp2 Mean F-stat p-value ηp2
5°/s Participant Type CFL
Control
0.947
0.994
F(1,18) = 20.91 <0.001 0.537 0.903
0.989
F(1,18) = 30.30 <0.001 0.627
10°/s Participant Type CFL
Control
0.939
0.992
F(1,18) = 15.55 0.001 0.463 0.876
0.980
F(1,18) = 18.69 <0.001 0.509
5°/s Viewing Condition Binocular
Dominant
Non-Dominant
0.990
0.983
0.939
F(2,18) = 9.63 0.001 0.506 0.967
0.953
0.919
F(2,18) = 3.39 0.056
10°/s Viewing Condition Binocular
Dominant
Non-Dominant
0.981
0.974
0.901
F(2,18) = 6.65 0.007 0.388 0.958
0.926
0.900
F(2,18) = 1.93 0.175