Table 3.
Comparison of Pearson’s correlation coefficients for inter-eye position, for CFL and control participants, for all three viewing conditions; p-values in bold represent significant difference in correlation coefficient means.
Horizontal Component | Vertical Component | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vel | Factor | Condition | Mean | F-stat | p-value | ηp2 | Mean | F-stat | p-value | ηp2 |
5°/s | Participant Type | CFL Control |
0.947 0.994 |
F(1,18) = 20.91 | <0.001 | 0.537 | 0.903 0.989 |
F(1,18) = 30.30 | <0.001 | 0.627 |
10°/s | Participant Type | CFL Control |
0.939 0.992 |
F(1,18) = 15.55 | 0.001 | 0.463 | 0.876 0.980 |
F(1,18) = 18.69 | <0.001 | 0.509 |
5°/s | Viewing Condition | Binocular Dominant Non-Dominant |
0.990 0.983 0.939 |
F(2,18) = 9.63 | 0.001 | 0.506 | 0.967 0.953 0.919 |
F(2,18) = 3.39 | 0.056 | — |
10°/s | Viewing Condition | Binocular Dominant Non-Dominant |
0.981 0.974 0.901 |
F(2,18) = 6.65 | 0.007 | 0.388 | 0.958 0.926 0.900 |
F(2,18) = 1.93 | 0.175 | — |