Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 23;34(3):187–189. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-206590.1
Author, year, country of publication Patient group Study type (level of evidence) Outcomes Key results Study weaknesses
Hartmann et al,
2015,1
USA
7276 subjects from 27 studies used for qualitative analysis. 6565 subjects from 20 studies used for average EtCO2. 6550 subjects from 19 studies for meta-analysis Systematic review and meta-analysis Participants with ROSC after CPR have statistically higher levels of ETCO2 The overall mean ETCO2 value was significantly higher among participants with ROSC than those without ROSC (25.8/−9.8 mm Hg vs 13.1/−8.2 mm Hg, p=0.001) (1) The overall level of evidence was characterised as very low by the GRADE criteria. (2) Mostly only cohort studies analysed (26/27 studies). (3) Big variance on time taken to initiate resuscitation, quality of compressions and use of different methods to deliver compressions between studies. (4) Presence of serious inconsistency, as measured by the degree of heterogeneity (p<0.001 and I2 value of 98.5%)
The average ETCO2 level was 25 mm Hg in participants with ROSC
The mean difference in ETCO2 was 12.7 mm Hg (95% CI 10.3 to 15.1) between participants with and without ROSC (p<0.001)
The mean difference in ETCO2 was not modified by the receipt of sodium bicarbonate, uncontrolled minute ventilation or era of resuscitation guidelines
The overall quality of data by Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria is very low, but there are currently no prospective data
Poon et al
2016,2
Hong Kong
319 patients Prospective cohort study A 3 min ETCO≤10 mm Hg was associated with poor prognosis and low chance of ROSC A 3 min ETCO>10 mm Hg was a predictor of ROSC with OR 18.16 (95% CI 4.79 to 51.32, p<0.001). In other words, when cardiac arrested, for a patient with a 3 min ETCO> 10 mm Hg the odds of ROSC was 18 times higher than those with ETCO2  ≤10 mm Hg Large number of patients excluded due to improper documentation of the use of ETCO2 (approximately one-third). (2) Quality of chest compressions was not controlled or measured. (3) The decision to stop resuscitation may have been influenced by the ETCO2 value at the time, which could have potential bias on ROSC rate
Akinci et al
2014,3
Turkey
80 patients Prospective cohort study PetCO2 values are higher in the ROSC group ETCO2 levels of the ROSC group in the 5th, 10th, 15th and 20th min were significantly higher compared with the Exitus group (p<0.001) (1) ETCO2 levels not measured on transport to hospital. ETCO2 value differences, which might be resulting from different arrest aetiologies (asphyxia and cardiac) could not be determined as a result of this. (2) Small sample size. (3) No clear indication or suggestion of what ETCO2 level can be used to prognosticate ROSC—however, does give an indication of when best to assess this. (4) Published in a low impact medical journal
During the CPR, the most reliable time for ROSC estimation according to PetCO2 values is 20th min In distinguishing ROSC and Exitus, ETCO2 measurements within 5–20 min intervals showed highest performance on the 20th (area below the ROC curve was determined to be 0.850 (95% CI 0.721 to 0.980)) and lowest on the 5th minute (area below the ROC curve was determined to be 0.730 (95% CI 0.610 to 0.849))
None of the patients who had ETCO2 levels less than 14 mm Hg survived
Pantazopoulos et al
2015,4
Greece
42 studies included in qualitative synthesis Narrative review Although changes and trends in ETCO2 values during CPR are more important than absolute ETCO2 levels, current data suggest that certain cut-off values may be targeted; an ETCO>10 mm Hg is correlated with increased possibility for ROSC No systematic review or meta-analysis done
Rescuers should target a 20 min ETCO2 of at least 20 mm Hg
The value of a trend more than absolute ETCO2 values may be most important in the presence of a treatable cause
An abrupt increase in ETCO2, under constant ventilation and CO2 production, provides the fastest indication of ROSC

CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; EtCO2, end tidal CO2; PetCO2, end tidal CO2 tension; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation.