Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 3;214(7):2073–2088. doi: 10.1084/jem.20162017

Table 1. CFs of SNV- and CNA-based growth clones.

Patient Growth clone No. SNVs Chrom Position TCN CF
TU S1 S2 X1 X2
P1 Mbp % % % % %
main 194.680 na na na 105 100 100 100 100
P1-q1 2.937 na na na 40 45 0 45 65
P1-q2 18.158 na na na 0 5 0 15 60
P1-q3 5.640 na na na 15 20 95 20 25
P1-q4 226 na na na 35 40 0 30 0
P1-q5 15.353 na na na 0 0 90 0 0
P1-c1 na X 1-155 1n 0 10 0 40 10
P2
main 14.875 na na na 95 100 100 100 100
P2-q1 796 na na na 0 10 10 45 90
P2-q2 1.174 na na na 0 0 0 0 60
P2-q3 3.106 na na na 0 15 20 10 0
P2-c1 raw na 5 63-69 3 n 0 70 40 30 10
P2-c1 raw na 5 71-180.5 3 n 0 70 40 30 10
P2-c1 raw na 7 62-70.5 3 n 10 60 40 20 0
P2-c1 raw na 7 70.5-88.5 3 n 0 70 40 30 0
P2-c1 combined na 5 and 7 na na 0 70 40 30 ≤10
P2-c2 raw na 7 90.5-117.5 3 n 100 60 50 30 0
P2-c2 raw na 7 117.5-159 4 n 100 60 40 30 0
P2-c2 combined na 7 na na 100 60 40-50 30 0
P2-c3 raw na 18 26.5-36.5 1 n 100 10 10 40 80
P2-c3 raw na 18 38.5-43 1 n 100 20 20 50 90
P2-c3 raw na 18 48.5-78 1 n 100 10 10 40 90
P2-c3 combined na 18 na na 100 10 10 40 90
P2-c4 raw na 3 95-102.5 4 n 0 10 0 10 60
P2-c4 raw na 3 105-175.5 4 n 0 0 0 10 60
P2-c4 raw na 3 175.5-198 5 n 0 0 0 0 70
P2-c4 combined na 3 na na 0 0 0 10 60
P2-c5 na 8 68-131.5 5 n 40 0 0 0 0
P2-c6 na 22 17.5-20 3 n 50 0 0 0 0
P3
main 13.625 na 13.625 na 100 100 100 100 100
P3-q1 608 na 608 na 0 10 0 15 85
P3-q2 343 na 343 na 0 55 95 55 10
P3-q3 390 na 390 na 0 0 65 0 0
P3-c1 raw na 3 1-7 4 n 30 0 0 0 0
P3-c1 raw na 3 13-29 4 n 20 0 0 0 0
P3-c1 raw na 3 29.5-33.5 4 n 20 0 0 0 0
P3-c1 raw na 3 52.5-61 4 n 30 0 0 0 0
P3-c1 combined na 3 na na 20-30 0 0 0 0
P3-c2 na 3 7-13 4 n 50 0 0 0 0
P3-c3 raw na 3 40.5-51.4 4 n 30 10 0 10 10
P3-c3 raw na 3 66.5-75.5 4 n 30 0 0 10 10
P3-c3 combined na 3 na na 30 ≤10 0 10 10
P3-c4 na 3 61-66.5 4 n 70 70 90 50 20
P3-c5 na 16 53.5-56 2 n 100 30 0 10 0
P3-c6 na 10 75-79 3 n 10 0 60 0 0

All noninteger CNA segments included are ≥2.5 Mbp, harbor maximal one noninteger allele, and have a minimum deviation of 30% from both contributing copy numbers in at least one sample (TU, S1, S2, X1, or X2). Breakpoints were rounded to the nearest 0.5 Mbp. Individual “raw” CNA segments were “combined” to CNA-based growth clones. Cellular fractions of raw CNA segments and CNA-based growth clones were rounded to the nearest 10%, cellular fractions of SNV-based growth clones to the neatest 5%. All experiments were performed independently with tumor material from three patients with CRC. c, CNA-based growth clone; na, not applicable; q, SNV-based growth clone.