Table 1.
Antagonistic symbiosis | Mutualism, small | Mutualism, large | ||||
Short run | Long run | Short run | Long run | Short run | Long run | |
/generation time | ♕Q | ♕Q | ♕Q | No effect | ♔K | No effect |
Mutation rate | No effect | ♕Q | No effect | No effect | No effect | No effect |
Selection strength | ♕Q | ♕Q | ♕Q | ♔K | ♔K | ♕Q |
Population size | ♕Q | ♕Q | ♕Q | ♔K | ♔K | ♕Q |
For each of the parameters that determine evolutionary rate, we ask whether the population with the larger parameter value, which therefore evolves faster, is more successful (♕Q, a Red Queen effect) or less successful (♔K, a Red King effect) in the interaction, holding the other rate parameters constant and equal between the two populations. The short-run results are numerically computed for particular parameter values (Figs. 1–3). The long-run results are for the weak-mutation limit and are exact (see text for details). For selection strength and population size in the mutualisms, (i) we set one population’s selection strength to w (or both populations’, when studying the effect of population size) and assume that the larger parameter value is larger by a small amount, (ii) we define “k small” as k < 1/(1 + w) and “k large“ as k > 1/(1 + w), and (iii) we assume the populations to be sufficiently large