Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 20;114(27):7049–7054. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705642114

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Discrete model explains the different stretching response of dsDNA and dsRNA. (A) Top and side views of dsDNA (Left) and dsRNA (Right) molecules. The model is based on the springiness hypothesis (5, 20), where purple beads represent consecutive base-pair centers and form a chain that runs around the helical axis of the molecules. This chain deviates from the helical axis significantly more for dsRNA than for dsDNA. (B) Each segment is characterized by the three parameters h, l, and β, where l is the distance to the next base-pair center, h is the projection of l on the helical axis, and β is the angle defined by these two parameters. The extension can increase by either reducing β (i.e., increasing cosβ) and/or increasing l. These values are denoted by xΔβ and xΔl, respectively. At first-order approximation, the total change in extension can be written as xΔh=xΔβ+xΔl (SI Appendix). (C) xΔβ/L and xΔl/L contributions to the total relative change in extension x/L (same data as in Fig. 2A) for dsDNA (Upper) and dsRNA (Lower). A linear fit constrained to pass through the origin point (1,0) was carried out for each dataset. From the slopes, we calculated kβ,DNA = 1,330 ± 50 pN, kβ,RNA= 522 ± 3 pN, kl,DNA = 5,600 ± 1,500 pN, and kl,RNA = 2,170 ± 140 pN. Error bars in C were calculated as described in Materials and Methods.