Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Leuk Lymphoma. 2016 Dec 14;58(8):1814–1822. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1265111

Table 2.

Univariate analysis of growth factor (GF) usage at any cycle* and first cycle febrile neutropenia**

Factor Level Number of Patients Growth Factor Febrile Neutropenia

Use at any cycle
N (%)
p-value Observed in first cycle of therapy
N (%)
p-value

Induction treatment R-CHOP 250 83(33) 0.99 40(16) 0.08
CHOP 270 90(33) 60(22)

Age (yrs) <65 130 29(22) 0.003 13(10) 0.002
≥65 390 144(37) 87(22)

Gender Male 262 79(30) 0.14 42(16) 0.07
Female 258 94(36) 58(23)

ECOG performance status 0–1 447 151(34) 0.6 78(17) 0.02
2–3 73 22(30) 22(30)

Hemoglobin (g/dl) <12 211 92(44) <0.0001 58(27) 0.0001
≥12 309 81(26) 42(14)

Lactic dehydrogenase Normal 217 64(29) 0.13 31(14) 0.02
Elevated 302 109(36) 69(23)

Marrow involvement No 422 137(32) 0.48 78(18) 0.39
Yes 98 36(37) 22(22)

Bulky disease (≥10 cm) No 408 140(34) 0.37 78(19) 0.89
Yes 112 33 (29) 22(20)

Ann Arbor stage I–II 139 44(32) 0.67 29(21) 0.62
III–IV 381 129(34) 71(19)

International Prognostic*** Low/LI 305 66(31) 0.34 31(14) 0.02
 Index (IPI) group HI/High 214 107(35) 69(23)

Age-adjusted*** Low/LI 257 78(30) 0.16 42(16) 0.10
 IPI group HI/High 262 95(36) 58(22)
*

GF use is defined as yes if GF was used either to prevent dose reduction/dose delay, or as prophylaxis in patients with a prior FN hospitalization, and was given within Days 1–6 of the treatment cycle

**

Fisher’s exact p-value is reported

***

LI=Low intermediate