Skip to main content
. 2016 May 13;9(5):372. doi: 10.3390/ma9050372

Table 3.

Factors associated with studies yielding significantly different failure rates between groups.

Variable Model 1 (Simulttaneously) Model 2 (Backwards)
Fit R2 = 0.31, p < 0.001 R2 = 0.19, p < 0.001
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Year of publication of trial 0.78 (0.62/0.99) 0.81 (0.68/0.96)
Journal impact >2 (ref.: ≤2) 3.53 (0.72/17.3) 3.26 (1.25/10.8)
Number of patients 1.02 (0.98/1.07)
Lesions per patient 0.66 (0.26/1.71)
Follow-up time (months) 1.01 (0.98/1.04) 1.02 (1.00/1.03)
Retained lesions (%)
Trials with load-bearing cavities (ref.: cervical) 0.29 (0.12/7.32) 0.29 (0.09/0.94)
Trials in permanent dentition (ref.: primary care) 3.3 (0.04/3.00)
Trials describing sample size calculation (ref.: not described) 2.48 (0.26/23.7)
Registered trials (ref.: not registered) n/a
Trials using outcome measure other than USPHS (ref.: USPHS) 7.46 (8.69/64.0) 4.77 (1.07/21.3)
Trials with sequence generation unclear/high (ref.: low) 3.61 (0.78/16.8)
Trials with allocation concealment unclear/high (ref.: low) n/a
Trial with blinding of operators unclear/high (ref.: low) n/a
Trials with blinding of examiners unclear/high (ref.: low) 0.51 (0.14/1.87)
Trials with missing data unclear/high (ref.: low) 0.44 (0.05/3.92)
Trials with selective reporting unclear/high (ref.: low) 557 (5.6/55,442) 12.1 (0.90/123)
Trials accounting for attrition in analysis/trails without attrition a (ref.: attrition not accounted for) 1.75 (0.64/4.78)

For regression analyses, variables were either entered simultaneously (Model 1), or entered and then removed backwards (Model 2). Model fit is indicated by R2 and p-values. Factors with significant positive (OR > 1) or negative (<1) association are highlighted in bold. For example, significant differences between groups were significantly more often found in journals with impact factor >2.