Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Orthod Craniofac Res. 2017 May;20(2):111–118. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12154

TABLE 1.

Comparison of mandibular displacement (T1–T0) in Herbst appliance and Comparison groups (t test and ANCOVAa). Cranial base superimposition.

ROI Coordinates Groups Mean SD Mean difference CI 95% T test P value F Groups F SNGoGn
Pogonion X Herbst −0.37 0.65 −0.29 −0.85 0.25 .279 2.056 0.073
Comparison −0.08 0.46
Y Herbst 2.20 1.31 1.66 0.74 2.60 .001** 14.396** 0.088
Comparison 0.54 1.34
Z Herbst 2.37 1.60 0.90 −0.21 2.03 .110 2.134 1.897
Comparison 1.47 1.64
3D Herbst 3.68 1.55 1.46 0.42 2.49 .007** 8.052** 1.833
Comparison 2.22 0.43

Mandible Pitch Herbst 0.06 0.60 0.35 −0.20 0.90 .207 1.853 0.926
Comparison −0.29 0.95

Pitch is defined as clockwise and/or counterclockwise rotation in a lateral view.

Entries in bold highlight the comparison in which significant difference was found.

a

ANCOVA indicates analysis of covariance; SD, standard deviation; CI 95%, confidence interval of 95%; X, mesial-lateral; Y, anterior-posterior; Z superior-inferior; (+), rightward, forward, downward, clockwise rotation; (−), leftward, backward, upward, counterclockwise rotation.

*

P<.05;

**

P<.01.