Table 5. Comparison of the different ROC-prediction models based on known markers of type 2 diabetes risk and those derived using metabolomics.
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | Model 7 | Model 8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | x | 0.2419 | 0.7313 | 0.7330 | 0.7486 | |||
Model 2 | x | x | 0.4363 | 0.4248 | 0.4007 | 0.1212 | ||
Model 3 | x | x | x | 0.7406 | 0.0057 | 0.6780 | ||
Model 4 | x | x | x | x | 0.4729 | |||
Model 5 | x | x | x | x | x | 0.9764 | 0.9733 | 0.2094 |
Model 6 | x | x | x | x | x | x | 0.9789 | |
Model 7 | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | |
Model 8 | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x |
Model 1: Non-invasive, Model 2: Noninvasive + metabolomics, Model 3: Adiponectin, Model 4: Adiponectin + metabolomics, Model 5: Metabolomics, Model 6: Optimized metabolomics, Model 7: Adiponectin without glucose measures and Model 8: Optimized metabolomics with glucose measures