. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 10.

Published in final edited form as: J Sex Med. 2014 Jan 28;11(3):800–808. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12425

Table 4.

The association between fibroid burden and deep dyspareunia by uterine volume and by fibroid size.

Covariate	Number of Women N (%)	aPOR^* (95% CI)
Fibroid Status
No Fibroids (reference)	304(37)	1.00
Uterine Volume <150cm³	289(35)	1.8 (1.13, 2.80)
Uterine Volume 150cm³–299cm³	168(20)	1.4 (0.84, 2.48)
Uterine Volume 300cm³ & over	66(8)	1.8 (0.83, 3.73)
No Fibroids (reference)	304(37)	1.00
Fibroid Size 0.5–3.99cm	369(45)	1.64 (1.1, 2.55)
Fibroid Size 4.0cm & greater	154(19)	1.74 (1.0,3.05)

aPOR =adjusted prevalence odds ratios. (Adjusted for age, education, ethnicity, number of deliveries, depression, pelvic pathology, and physical activity.)