Abstract
Cholesterol is a vital component of the human body. It stabilizes cell membranes and is the precursor of bile acids, vitamin D and steroid hormones. However, cholesterol accumulation in the bloodstream (hypercholesterolemia) can cause atherosclerotic plaques within artery walls, leading to heart attacks and strokes. The efficiency of cholesterol absorption in the small intestine is of great interest because human and animal studies have linked cholesterol absorption with plasma concentration of total and low density lipoprotein cholesterol. Cholesterol absorption is highly regulated and influenced by particular compounds in the food supply. Therefore, it is desirable to learn more about natural food components that inhibit cholesterol absorption so that food ingredients and dietary supplements can be developed for consumers who wish to manage their plasma cholesterol levels by non-pharmacological means. Food components thus far identified as inhibitors of cholesterol absorption include phytosterols, soluble fibers, phospholipids, and stearic acid.
Keywords: cholesterol absorption, functional food, nutraceutical, dietary supplement
INTRODUCTION
Cholesterol is an essential component of the human body. Cholesterol functions in a variety of capacities including, but not limited to, stabilizing cell membranes and serving as precursor for bile acids, vitamin D, and steroid hormones. Every cell of the human body can synthesize cholesterol when needed, but cells cannot catabolize cholesterol by oxidative processes. Therefore, any excess cholesterol must be transported to the liver, secreted into bile (as cholesterol or bile acids), and eliminated from the body by the intestinal route. Whole body cholesterol metabolism is in a delicate balance. When imbalances occur, cholesterol can accumulate in the gallbladder promoting gallstone formation. Cholesterol accumulation in the bloodstream (hypercholesterolemia) can cause atherosclerotic plaques to form within artery walls.
The discovery of transporters, receptors, and enzymes specific to cholesterol metabolism has changed our understanding of how sterols are absorbed into the body. The transport of cholesterol and phytosterols into the enterocyte is a tightly regulated process (Fig. 1). From a health standpoint, the efficiency of cholesterol absorption and the crosstalk with the processes of cholesterol and lipoprotein synthesis is of great interest, as many studies have linked cholesterol absorption with plasma total and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentration (1–5). This link is so important that a class of drugs was developed that blocks the intestinal absorption of cholesterol and, consequently, lowers plasma LDL cholesterol concentration. This class of drugs has also helped researchers elucidate some of the mechanisms of cholesterol transport at the cellular level (6,7). One of the drugs, ezetimibe, has become an important therapy in managing LDL cholesterol levels in individuals who can tolerate drug therapy. However, because drugs can produce severe side effects, it is desirable to learn more about natural food components that inhibit cholesterol absorption so that food ingredients and dietary supplements can be developed for consumers who wish to manage their plasma cholesterol levels by non-pharmacological means. Mc Auley et al. (8) developed a mathematical model of whole body cholesterol metabolism and the dysfunction that can follow with aging. The authors hypothesized that their model could be used to evaluate the effects of lifestyle modifications, such as phytosterol and fiber intake, to inhibit cholesterol absorption and ultimately the potential for lowering plasma LDL cholesterol.
Fig. 1.
Transport of cholesterol (CHOL) and phytosterols (PS) in the intestinal lumen, enterocytes, hepatocytes, and plasma. Dietary CHOL and PS mix with biliary CHOL from the gallbladder to form micelles within the intestinal lumen. The micelles also contain other digested lipids that are transported to the brush border where the lipids are delivered to the enterocyte. Specific transporters, scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI) and Neiman-Pick C1 Like 1 (NPC1L1), transport the majority of CHOL and PS into the enterocyte. However, nearly all of the PS is redirected back to the intestinal lumen by the transporters ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporter G5 and G8 (ABCG5 and ABCG8, respectively) for excretion from the body. Some CHOL may also be transported back into the intestinal lumen by ABCG5 and ABCG8, although evidence for this is less conclusive. About half of the CHOL is packaged into lipoproteins and transported into the lymphatic system and eventually the bloodstream for delivery to the liver. Consequently, cholesterol absorption efficiency is generally estimated to be about 50~60%.
When foods are consumed, cholesterol arrives in the small intestine from both the diet and bile (Fig. 1). Dietary cholesterol accounts for approximately 300 mg/d (9–11), whereas biliary cholesterol is estimated to contribute 800~1,400 mg/d (12,13). The liver–not the diet–is therefore the primary source of cholesterol available for intestinal absorption, a point that is often underappreciated. Consequently, therapies that block cholesterol absorption are effective at lowering LDL cholesterol mainly because they prevent the reabsorption of endogenous cholesterol back to the liver. This explains why individuals who consume no animal products (i.e., no cholesterol) will also experience reductions in LDL cholesterol when given absorption-blocking therapies.
Biliary cholesterol enters the small intestine unesterified, along with the other major components of bile (phosphatidylcholine and bile acids). As the components of bile mix with dietary lipids, micelles form spontaneously. Micelles are lipid aggregates that form when a critical concentration of lipid from bile mixes with lipids entering the small intestine from the diet. Bile acids act as detergents allowing the lipids to “dissolve” in an aqueous environment, facilitating their delivery to the brush border. The proportion of bile acids, phospholipid, and cholesterol must be maintained within a specific range to optimize the formation of micelles in the lumen of the intestine (14).
Furthermore, bile acids are required for the micellar solubilization of cholesterol, but are also synthesized from cholesterol within the hepatocyte. After micelles have facilitated the solubilization, digestion, and absorption of lipids in the proximal small intestine, bile acids are reabsorbed in the distal small intestine (ileum) by the apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter specific bile acid transporter, ASBT (15). Pharmaceutical compounds known as bile acid sequestrants (cholestyramine and colestipol) are effective at lowering plasma LDL cholesterol because they promote intestinal bile acid excretion, which limits their reabsorption, and results in the liver using more cholesterol for bile acid synthesis. This increased demand for cholesterol in the liver causes an upregulation of LDL uptake from the plasma, thus resulting in lower plasma LDL cholesterol concentration. In this pathway, micelle formation and cholesterol absorption is not affected by treatment with bile acid sequestrants or inhibition of ASBT, because the liver compensates for the reduced bile acid reabsorption by increasing the synthesis of bile acids (16,17). This allows the total bile acid pool size to remain unchanged, even though the turnover of bile acids due to pharmaceutical or dietary factors is much greater.
The discovery of intestinal cholesterol transporters has been a key component to the continued understanding of cholesterol absorption. Transport into enterocytes is mediated by a specific transporter, Neiman-Pick C1 Like 1 (NPC1L1) protein in the proximal small intestine and has been shown to be inhibited by the pharmaceutical ezetimibe (6). NPC1L1 also transports dietary phytosterols into the enterocyte. Davis et al. (18) first demonstrated NPC1L1 knockout mice have significantly reduced uptake of cholesterol and phytosterols, compared to wild type mice. Cholesterol and phytosterols are utilized quite differently once taken up into the enterocyte. Despite the ability of NPC1L1 to transport both cholesterol and phytosterols, less than 1% of dietary phytosterols enter the circulation, whereas 50~60% of intestinal cholesterol enters the circulation. This alternate processing of phytosterols is due to the ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporter G5 and G8 (ABCG5 and ABCG8, respectively) effectively secreting phytosterols back into the lumen of the intestine (19–21). Though the role of intestinal ABCG5 and ABCG8 in cholesterol transport is not well studied, there is some support to the hypothesis that upregulating intestinal ABCG5 and ABCG8 transporters will divert more cholesterol from the enterocyte back into the intestinal lumen, effectively creating an anti-hyperlipidemic effect (22). Yet the potential inability (or diminished ability) of cholesterol to interact with ABCG5 and ABCG8 is one possible explanation for the differential absorption rates between cholesterol and phytosterols.
Dietary components reduce cholesterol absorption through one or more mechanism and a primary mode of inhibiting cholesterol absorption is through the binding of bile acids and disrupting the formation of micelles. When dietary lipids are consumed, all of the components of the micelle are transported from the lumen of the intestine to the brush border. While absorption of dietary triacylglycerol is absorbed very efficiently (90~100%); cholesterol absorption is generally found to be less well absorbed at a rate of 50~60% (23). Although the impact on whole body cholesterol balance may be slight, there is evidence to support the hypothesis that biliary cholesterol is absorbed more efficiently than dietary cholesterol, due to its association with the bile acids and phospholipid in bile (24).
The following sections of this review focus on specific dietary components that inhibit cholesterol absorption through known or hypothesized mechanisms.
PHYTOSTEROLS
Phytosterols are structural components of plant cell membranes and function similarly to cholesterol in animal cells. The most abundant phytosterols are sitosterol, campesterol, and stigmasterol, with the structural differences occurring in the side chain attached to the steroid ring. Plant stanols are saturated sterols (i.e., no double bond in the steroid ring) and are much less abundant in nature compared to their corresponding sterols. In the human diet, phytostanols comprise about 5~10% of the total sterol/stanol present (10,25,26). Due to their low abundance in the diet, phytostanols are often reported as a part of the total “phytosterol” content of a particular food or dietary intake. Western societies consume about 200~300 mg phytosterols per day (10,25–30), whereas Asian and vegetarian diets provide higher amount of phytosterols in the diet (31,32).
The cholesterol lowering properties of dietary phytosterols have been known for decades. Moderate levels of phytosterols consumed in usual diets probably exert some minimal effect on cholesterol absorption, although higher amounts (1~3 g/d) are needed to produce significant reductions in plasma LDL cholesterol. As a therapeutic food ingredient, phytosterols/stanols are often esterified with long-chain fatty acids to increase their solubility for incorporation into food products. Meta-analyses have consistently shown that intake of 1~3 g/d of phytosterol (or stanol) esters lowers plasma LDL cholesterol concentration up to 15% compared to placebo (33–36). An inverse dose response relationship exists between phytosterol/stanol ester intake and LDL cholesterol concentration, but tapers off at intakes above 3 g/d with little added benefit at higher intakes (37).
The mechanisms whereby phytosterols inhibit cholesterol absorption are not entirely clear and likely includes multiple pathways to disrupt cholesterol absorption. Proposed mechanisms include the inhibition of cholesterol ester hydrolysis; competition with cholesterol for solubilization into mixed micelles; co-crystallization of cholesterol and phytosterols; competition for transport across the apical membrane of enterocytes; and impaired intracellular re-esterification of cholesterol by acyl-coenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase-2 (ACAT-2) for incorporation into chylomicrons and secretion into the lymphatic system.
First, the interaction of phytosterol esters with digestive enzymes is a possible point of regulation, although the extent of interaction is still uncertain. On one hand, Nissinen et al. (38) demonstrated that high levels of sitostanol esters infused into healthy subjects were rapidly hydrolyzed and incorporated into micelles, causing cholesterol and its esters to accumulate in the oil phase. Preferential interaction of phytosterol esters with digestive enzymes would also preclude dietary cholesterol esters from hydrolysis, further limiting cholesterol absorption. In contrast, it has been suggested that phytosterol esters are poorly hydrolyzed by digestive enzymes (39). If the phytosterol esters remain intact within the intestinal lumen, they could attract other lipophilic compounds, including cholesterol and cholesterol esters, and carry them to distal parts of the intestinal where cholesterol absorption is much less efficient. Absorption of dietary cholesterol esters is dependent upon hydrolysis by pancreatic cholesterol esterase (PCE) to yield free cholesterol and a free fatty acid. The free cholesterol is then solubilized by bile to form mixed micelles in the lumen of the intestine (40). PCE is responsible for the hydrolysis of both cholesterol and phytosterol esters. One study has found that both sterol and fatty acid components of a sterol ester influence the rate of hydrolysis by PCE, with cholesterol esters having the highest rate of hydrolysis by PCE, followed by sitosterol, stigmastanol, and stigmasterol esters (41). The authors hypothesized that PCE may play a discriminatory role in the hydrolysis of sterol esters, specifically phytosterols that can compete with cholesterol for incorporation into mixed micelles. In a similar study, phytosterol esters fed to hamsters were effective at inhibiting cholesterol absorption if the phytosterol esters were hydrolyzed and the free sterol was allowed to compete with cholesterol for incorporation into micelles (42). Further research is clearly needed to resolve this issue.
Second, as mentioned previously, micelles play a key role in lipid absorption, acting as vehicles that transport both lipophilic and amphiphilic compounds towards the intestinal wall. Cholesterol not dissolved in micelles will form a separate oil phase within the intestinal lumen, making it generally unavailable for absorption (43). Using model bile solutions in vitro, Ikeda and coworkers reported that cholesterol solubility was significantly decreased in the presence of sitosterol (44–46). They further demonstrated that sitosterol, infused with cholesterol into rat intestinal tracts as an artificial “bile” mixture, significantly reduced cholesterol absorption in vivo (45). Armstrong and Carey (40) conducted a thermodynamic analysis of micellar solubilities and found that sitosterol, compared to cholesterol, had a higher binding affinity for micelles. In vitro studies in our laboratory suggest that the higher affinity of phytosterols causes cholesterol to be displaced from the micelle (47). Heinemann et al. (48) published an intestinal perfusion study in healthy volunteers and found that both sitosterol and sitostanol reduced cholesterol absorption by disrupting cholesterol solubility in micelles. In another infusion study, Nissinen et al. (38) observed that in subjects receiving either high or low amounts of plant stanol esters, cholesterol solubility in micelles was decreased due to displacement by plant stanols. Using a variety of in vitro techniques, Mel’nikov et al. (49) found the both sitosterol and sitostanol reduced the concentration of cholesterol in dietary mixed micelles via a dynamic competition mechanism. These investigators further concluded that cholesterol, sitosterol and sitostanol compete equally for solubilization in micelles. While there is general agreement that phytosterols compete with cholesterol during micelle formation, the degree of solubilization likely depends on the composition of other lipids–dietary and biliary–present in the intestinal lumen (14).
The third proposed mechanism whereby phytosterols reduce cholesterol absorption is co-crystallization of cholesterol with phytosterols. The concept that co-crystallization would render cholesterol unavailable for absorption has been considered for some time, but the data are quite limited. Christiansen et al. (50) investigated the solubility and phase behavior of sitosterol and cholesterol (and mixtures thereof) in the presence and absence of water. As expected, the solubility of both sitosterol and cholesterol were significantly reduced in water-acetone solutions compared to acetone alone, but the decrease in solubility was much greater with sitosterol. When mixtures of cholesterol/sitosterol in ratios of 3:1, 1:1, and 1:3 were co-precipitated from the water-acetone solution, the total sterol solubility decreased with increasing proportions of sitosterol, suggesting that the more hydrophobic sitosterol promotes co-crystallization with cholesterol. Under more realistic conditions, Mel’nikov et al. (51) examined the co-crystallization properties of cholesterol/sitosterol and cholesterol/sitostanol mixtures from triglyceride oil that was hydrolyzed to mimic the intestinal environment during digestion. However, during lipolysis of the model dietary emulsions, no crystal formation was detected. The researchers concluded that the solubility of sterols significantly increased in the products of lipid hydrolysis and that their solubility increased in parallel with solvent polarity (free fatty acids> diglyceride oil> triglyceride oil). These results suggest that co-crystallization of phytosterols and cholesterol may not occur to a great extent in vivo and would not be a major contributor in reducing cholesterol absorption (51).
The fourth proposed mechanism involves the regulation of the intestinal transporters NPC1L1, ABCG5, and ABCG8. As described earlier, NPC1L1 resides in the brush border membrane and transports both cholesterol and phytosterols into the enterocyte (6,18,52–54), whereas ABCG5 and ABCG8 transport phytosterols and possible cholesterol back to the intestinal lumen (21). In this way, phytosterols could compete with cholesterol for binding to NPC1L1, although direct evidence for this is lacking. It is also possible that phytosterols could inhibit gene expression of NPC1L1 (55) or, conversely, enhance expression of ABCG5 and ABCG8, which could promote cholesterol efflux if, indeed, cholesterol is transported by ABCG5 and ABCG8. However, Field et al. (56) recently reported that NPC1L1 mRNA was not changed in hamsters fed plant stanols. They also found that ABCG5 and ABCG8 mRNA was decreased by plant stanols rather than increased, suggesting that the cholesterol lowering effect of plant stanols (and sterols) is unrelated to changes in gene expression of NPC1L1, ABCG5, or ABCG8. The study by Field et al. (56) does not exclude the possibility that unknown transporters of cholesterol are regulated by phytosterols.
The fifth possible mechanism, in which intestinal ACAT-2 is inhibited by phytosterols, is based on the differential affinities of sterols for the enzyme. ACAT isoforms have been shown to have significantly lower substrate specificity for phytosterols than for cholesterol (57–59), resulting in more unesterified phytosterol being available for return to the intestinal lumen (via ABCG5/ABCG8). However, this difference in specificity does not appear to be an important mechanism for lowering cholesterol absorption as the presence of sitosterol along with cholesterol did not inhibit cholesterol esterification (45,57). While the difference in sterol specificity may account for very low plasma concentration of phytosterols in humans, inhibition of ACAT-2 is unlikely a major mechanism for reduction in cholesterol absorption.
SOLUBLE FIBERS
Dietary fiber is defined as consisting of nondigestible carbohydrates and lignin that are intrinsic and intact in plants (60). While dietary fiber is consumed as a part of plant material, functional fiber is used as an added ingredient in manufactured food products. The Institute of Medicine’s Food and Nutrition Board has defined fiber accordingly: “dietary fiber” consists of nondigestible carbohydrates that are intrinsic and intact in plants, whereas “functional fiber” consists of isolated nondigestible carbohydrates that have beneficial physiological effects in humans (61).
Fibers are also categorized by their solubility in water. Insoluble fibers are found mainly in cell walls of plants and include cellulose, some hemicelluloses and lignin. Good sources of insoluble fiber are vegetables, legumes, whole wheat (particularly bran), nuts, and seeds. Though insoluble fibers have some capacity to hold water, much of insoluble fibers impact on the gastrointestinal tract is due to added dietary “bulk” that increases both the rate of transit through the gastrointestinal tract and fecal volume. Alternate terms have been suggested by the Institute of Medicine. It was proposed to use “viscous fiber” instead of soluble fiber, and “fermentable fiber” instead of insoluble fiber to describe the physiochemical properties of fiber. Interestingly, previous evidence indicates insoluble fibers have little impact on cholesterol concentrations (62). More recent evidence shows carrot insoluble fiber consumption results in significant reductions in serum triacylglycerol and serum and liver cholesterol, while increasing fecal cholesterol and bile acid excretion (63).
In contrast to insoluble fiber adding to fecal bulk, soluble fiber is attracted to water in the intestine and forms a viscous matrix that in turn leads to a variety of effects on the body. Although soluble fibers are both viscous and fermentable, the independent role of viscosity in reducing cholesterol absorption has been clearly demonstrated (4). The consumption of fiber rich foods, specifically soluble fiber, has been associated with improvements in diabetes (64), plasma LDL concentrations and coronary heart disease (65,66), and gastrointestinal health of patients with intestinal cancers (67). Much of the evidence supporting soluble fibers contribution to improving coronary heart disease is due to their ability to inhibit cholesterol absorption. The hypolipidemic and cardioprotective effects have been documented feeding trials in animal (68,69), human (70,71), and systematic reviews and meta-analyses (72,73). Furthermore, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has issued statements supporting the consumption of dietary fiber in the prevention of both cancer and coronary heart disease (74,75).
Soluble fibers can be considered both dietary and functional fibers as they are in native foods and used as additives in food products. These include pectin, β-glucans, fructans, gums, and resistant starch (RS) (i.e., resistant to digestion by mammalian enzymes). The pectin family has excellent binding and gel-forming properties and has been used widely in the food industry as a food additive as a thickener, gelling agent, or health supplement. A recent study examining the effect of adding pectin to the diet of male Syrian hamsters on high-cholesterol diet showed significant reductions in plasma and liver lipids (triacylglycerol and cholesterol), and significant increases in fecal lipids (cholesterol, triacylglycerol, and bile acids) (76). The authors concluded that the soluble dietary fiber included in the diet decreased plasma lipids by reducing lipid absorption in the intestine.
β-Glucans are found in cereal brans, especially oats and barley, and in yeast, the latter being an important commercial source (77). β-Glucans provide thickening properties when used as a food ingredient. A randomized controlled trial was designed to identify the physiological effects of concentrated oat β-glucans in humans. The trail targeted outcomes related to cardiovascular disease risk by measuring serum total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, triacylglycerol, apolipoprotein A-1, and apolipoprotein B. After the six-week trial was completed, oat β-glucans significantly reduced total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol (78). Although fructans are soluble in water, they do not have the typical gel-forming or ion- binding properties of other soluble fibers (79). Fructans are primarily known for their ability to support the growth of beneficial intestinal microflora, rather than contributing to the physical characteristics of food products (80).
Gums are consumed as both dietary fiber from legumes, oats, and barley, and as functional fibers. Gums consumed as a functional fiber are extracted from seeds, seaweed, plant exudates, and microbial fermentation and are used for their ability to provide thickening, stability, emulsification, and glossy appearance to food products (81). Gums have long been shown to reduce plasma cholesterol in humans (82) and animals (83). More recent evidence in rats fed diets enriched with cluster beans for eight weeks found significant reductions in serum total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol when compared to the respective chow fed controls or high cholesterol diet controls (84). Furthering this point, a confirmatory study feeding gum arabic for six months to a Sudanese patient population with newly discovered hyperlipidemia found significant reductions in total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, and triacylglycerol (85).
RSs are found in a wide variety of plant-based foods and are a low calorie, prebiotic dietary fiber. RSs are classified into four categories (RS1, RS2, RS3, and RS4) based on their physiochemical properties. When added as a food ingredient, RSs can impart viscosity to the final product. Several types of RS are commercially available and may be used as functional fibers to improve intestinal health (86). RS4 is of particular interest, as this RS is of the crosslinked type and when added to food, it has little impact on the physiochemical and organoleptic properties final product. Additionally, RS4 has some gastrointestinal side effects such as bloating (87,88). In a double blind controlled crossover trail, 86 men and women were given flour containing RS4. The authors reported significant reductions in total cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol (89).
The mechanism of action by which dietary fibers protect against cardiovascular disease has not been fully elucidated. Many hypotheses have been proposed as to how dietary fiber reduces the risk of cardiovascular diseases. Examples of the potential mechanism of action include the interaction with and fermentation of fiber by gut bacteria (90,91), delayed gastric emptying (92), increased muscle glucose transporter type 4 expression and glucose uptake (93), decreased absorption of dietary fats (94), and increased excretion of fecal cholesterol (95). Unfortunately, there is some inconsistency in the published data regarding the effects of soluble fiber. For example, guar gum was reported to decrease cholesterol absorption in some studies (96,97), but not in others (98,99). Similarly, pectin was shown to inhibit cholesterol absorption in some studies (83,96), while others found no effect of pectin on absorption (100,101). The amount of soluble fiber consumed, chemical and physical modification of the fibers, and the composition of the background diet are variables that can affect the research outcomes.
Despite the variable outcomes reported in the literature, viscous soluble fibers consistently showed improvements in cardiovascular disease outcomes. Viscous fibers were shown to increase the thickness of the unstirred water-layer in humans (102,103), as well as reduce the amount of cholesterol appearing in the lymph of cannulated rats (46,96). While others have reported increased bile acid output in hamsters fed psyllium and suggest that increased viscosity of the gastrointestinal contents may have disrupted micelle formation and promoted bile acid excretion (104,105). While the precise mechanism of action of soluble fibers has not been elucidated yet, the most prominent mechanism of action is likely due to the ability of soluble fibers to form a viscous matrix within the gastrointestinal tract that impedes cholesterol uptake in the enterocyte.
PHOSPHOLIPIDS
Phospholipids are a group of amphipathic molecules in which long acyl chains form a hydrophobic region, while a hydrophilic region is formed by a phosphate-containing “head” group. The acyl chains can be highly variable; phospholipids from animals tend to be more saturated than those of plant origin. Molecules that comprise the polar head group are typically choline, ethanolamine, serine, or inositol, although choline is mostly frequently found in both plant and animal phospholipids. Because of their unique chemical structure, phospholipids spontaneously form lipid bilayers and are therefore the primary structural components of cell membranes. In addition to their role in cell membranes, phospholipids are a major component of bile and participate in micelle formation and cholesterol solubilization. Phosphotidylcholine (PC) is the primary biliary phospholipid and, when secreted into the intestine, can exceed dietary phospholipid amounts by as much as 5 to 1 (106). Food sources naturally rich in PC include egg yolks, muscle foods, peanuts and soybeans. Naturally occurring soybean PC contains 10~20% saturated fatty acids, whereas native egg yolk PC contains 40~50% saturated fatty acids. Food manufacturers frequently use purified PC (also called lecithin) as a food ingredient because of its excellent emulsifying properties.
Sphingomyelin (SM) is another phosphoslipid found mostly in animal tissues; therefore, good food sources of SM include egg yolks, muscle foods, and milk and dairy products. SM is similar to PC to the extent they share the same phosphate-choline head group and have long chain, hydrophobic acyl moieties, but SM differs in several ways from naturally occurring PC. Whereas the backbone of PC is a glycerol base, the backbone of SM is a sphingoid base, which increases the polarity of SM and allows for stronger intra- and inter-molecular hydrogen bonding (107). The main acyl chain of SM is usually longer than the fatty acyl chains of PC and is frequently saturated. These characteristics contribute to a stronger interaction between cholesterol and SM in cell membranes compared to other phospholipids (108,109).
The ability of PC to inhibit cholesterol absorption was first demonstrated in experimental animals (110,111) and later in humans given intraduodenal PC infusion (112). Kesaniemi and Grundy (113) also found a small but significant reduction in cholesterol absorption in hyperlipidemic patients fed soy PC. Koo and colleagues (114,115) have shown that egg PC inhibits cholesterol absorption in lymph duct cannulated rats, and that egg PC is more effective at reducing absorption than soy PC. In fact, soy PC did not interfere with cholesterol absorption but rather produced a slight increase in absorption relative to no-PC controls. These researchers suggested that the higher degree of fatty acid saturation in egg PC compared to soy PC may have caused greater disruption of micellar solubilization of cholesterol. This hypothesis was further supported in rats that had lower rates of cholesterol absorption when fed hydrogenated (i.e., fully saturated) PC compared to native PC, whether from soy (116) or egg (115).
SM also inhibits cholesterol absorption in experimental animals, and this effect has been shown to be dose-dependent (106,116,117). Noh and Koo (118) further reported that milk SM was a more potent inhibitor than egg SM, suggesting that a higher degree of saturated and long chain length of milk SM may be important factors. Eckhardt et al. (106) indicated that milk SM compared to egg PC was more effective in reducing cholesterol solubility in micelles and in limiting cholesterol uptake in Caco-2 cells. They also observed that milk SM significantly reduced cholesterol absorption in mice, whereas egg PC had no effect. On an equal molar basis, it appears that SM is a more effective inhibitor of cholesterol absorption than PC. Despite considerably more dietary and biliary PC compared to SM in the intestine under normal conditions, the addition of SM to the diets of experimental animals was still able to reduce cholesterol absorption in the presence of endogenous PC, indicating a higher potency of SM relative to PC (106,116). Feeding mice SM (119) or a mixture of sphingolipids (120) resulted in lower cholesterol absorption and an added benefit of protecting against liver steatosis (non- alcoholic fatty liver disease). Human studies, however, are limited and the efficacy of dietary SM is still uncertain (121,122).
There appears to be multiple mechanisms by which dietary phospholipids inhibit cholesterol absorption. In vitro studies have suggested that intact (undigested) PC disrupts micelle formation by interfering with enzymatic hydrolysis of dietary lipids. Studies have indicated that the presence of PC on the surface of lipid emulsions hinders the hydrolysis of triglycerides (123,124), which also inhibits cholesterol uptake into IEC-6 intestinal cells (125). The addition of phospholipase A2 in vitro was able to overcome the inhibitory action of PC, resulting in increased absorption of cholesterol into Caco-2 cells (126). Because PC is rapidly hydrolyzed by digestive enzymes under normal conditions, relatively large amounts of dietary PC are likely needed to inhibit cholesterol absorption. By comparison, dietary SM is digested slowly and may affect cholesterol in two ways. First, SM binding to cholesterol in the intestinal lumen may prevent cholesterol from incorporating into micelles. The preferential affinity of cholesterol for SM is well-documented (127–129), and lack of micellarization results in increased fecal cholesterol excretion. Second, the strong association between cholesterol and SM in the enterocyte membrane may prevent cholesterol from interacting with its key transport protein, NPC1L1, as reported in intestinal cell lines (130) and animal studies (131).
STEARIC ACID
Stearic acid is an 18-carbon saturated fatty acid present in virtually all edible fats and oils, primarily as a constituent of triacylglycerol molecules. Common fats/oils in Western diets having the highest percentage of stearic acid are beef fat (20%) and cocoa butter (33%). Several tree nuts and seeds indigenous to West Africa, India, and Southeast Asia contain relatively high percentages of stearic acid, including dhupa, illipe, kokum, mango kernel, sal, and shea (132). The use of sheanut oil (shea butter) and sal oil has expanded into Europe and Japan as cocoa butter substitutes in chocolate making. These stearic acid-rich oils are also used in cosmetics, candles, and other industrial products worldwide. Sheanut oil contains about 38% stearic acid and sal oil contains about 34% stearic acid.
It is generally accepted worldwide that consumption of saturated fatty acids (SFA) raises LDL cholesterol concentration and increases the risk of atherosclerotic diseases. The World Health Organization, the European Food Safety Authority, the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, and many other organizations recommend limiting intake of SFA. However, stearic acid is unique among dietary SFA because it does not raise plasma cholesterol levels, as originally observed in the 1960s by Keys et al. (133) and Hegsted et al. (134). When replacing trans fatty acids or other saturated fatty acids in the diet, stearic acid lowers LDL cholesterol (135). The neutral or cholesterol lowering effect of dietary stearic acid has been observed repeatedly in animal and human studies (135–137). Despite these observations, the American Heart Association acknowledges that there is no simple way to incorporate specific information about stearic acid into dietary guidelines because stearic acid is generally found with other saturated fatty acids in foods and because the content of specific fatty acids is not provided to consumers (138).
Animal studies have demonstrated that the cholesterol-lowering effect of stearic acid is mediated by reducing cholesterol absorption. Feldman et al. (139,140) were the first to demonstrate a reduction in cholesterol absorption using three different methods to quantify cholesterol absorption (i.e., plasma isotope ratio method, fecal dual isotope method, and lymph duct cannulation), and in each case absorption was significantly decreased by stearic acid. Other studies using lymph duct cannulated rats fed stearic acid-enriched diets showed significant reductions in cholesterol absorption (141,142). Schneider et al. (143) used a more realistic dietary approach by feeding hamsters the NIH-07 cereal-based diet specifically enriched in single fatty acids (stearic, palmitic, oleic, linoleic, or trans fatty acids); cholesterol absorption was significantly reduced in hamsters fed stearic acid compared to the other fatty acids. As a result of lower cholesterol absorption, fecal cholesterol excretion was increased in rats and hamsters fed stearic acid diets (143–145).
Schmidt and Gallaher (146) reported that cholesterol solubilization was decreased within the intestinal contents of rats fed stearic acid-enriched diets. One possible mechanism of action of stearic acid is its ability to interfere with micelle formation through its incorporation into phospholipids. Unlike most of the other food components that inhibit cholesterol absorption, stearic acid is relatively well absorbed into the bloodstream and body tissues. Wang and Koo (147,148) reported that, after absorption, stearic acid was preferentially incorporated into hepatic and biliary phospholipids compared to other dietary fatty acids. Cohen and Carey (149) demonstrated that micelle stability and cholesterol solubility were impaired when micellar phospholipids contained stearic acid compared to unsaturated fatty acids. Another possible mode of action may involve alterations in the bile acid species present in the enterohepatic circulation. We have shown that dietary stearic acid decreased the proportion of secondary bile acids in the gallbladder compared to primary bile acids, thus decreasing the overall hydrophobicity index (150). Similarly, Hassel et al. (151) reported significantly lower proportions of secondary bile acids in feces of hamsters fed stearic acid. Secondary bile acids are more hydrophobic than primary bile acids and their diminished presence in the enterohepatic circulation can decrease the efficiency by which micelles solubilize cholesterol (40). It is also possible the stearic acid exerts some regulatory effect on cholesterol transport into (or within) the enterocyte, although this has not been reported. Nevertheless, dietary stearic acid most likely inhibits cholesterol absorption through systemic mechanisms rather than disrupting micelle formation through physical interactions within the intestinal lumen.
OTHER CHOLESTEROL-LOWERING FOOD COMPOUNDS
Several other compounds in the food supply have been identified as having cholesterol-lowering properties. Their mechanisms of action are poorly understood and may not be directly involve reduced cholesterol absorption. Nevertheless, we felt these compounds should be mentioned in this review.
Alkylresorcinols
Wheat alkylresorcinols were recently found to increase cholesterol excretion by 39.6% and decrease blood cholesterol concentration by 30.4% in mice fed a high fat and high sucrose diet designed to induce obesity and glucose intolerance (152). The same group completed a followup to that study with the aim of identifying the possible mechanism of action wheat alkylresorcinols have on increasing fecal cholesterol excretion. The follow-up study confirmed wheat alkylresorcinols effects on increasing cholesterol excretion and in vitro studies revealed a dose dependent decrease in micellar cholesterol solubility in model bile (153).
Policosanols
Consuming policosanols was a promising therapy for dyslipidemia. An early clinical trial examining the efficacy and tolerability of 10 mg/d policosanol in elderly patients (154) and a follow up clinical trial by the same group in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and elevated serum total and LDL cholesterol (155) found serum total cholesterol was reduced by 16.4 and 17.5%, respectively, and serum LDL cholesterol was reduced by 17.5 and 21.8%, respectively. Since these early studies, there has been limited evidence to support policosanols effectiveness in treating dyslipidemia and trials delivering twice the dose (20 mg/d) found no effect on reducing serum cholesterol concentration (156).
Guggulsterone
Guggulsterone (also known as guggul) has been used in Ayurvedic medicine and is classified as a plant steroid. A variety of in vitro and in vivo studies has been performed using guggul with consistent mechanistic and clinical results. A recent clinical trial registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of India found consumption of fresh guggul found significant reductions in serum total cholesterol, triglyceride and very LDL cholesterol (157). The mechanism of action for guggul’s lipid lowering efficacy has largely been isolated to agonistic effects on the farnesoid X receptor (FXR). Wild type and FXR null mice were fed a high cholesterol diet supplemented with guggul, while the wild type mice saw significantly lower accumulation of hepatic cholesterol; the FXR null mice realized no effect of guggul consumption (158). This led the investigators to hypothesize that the mechanism of action is the agonistic behavior of guggul on FXR.
Cyclodextrins
Cyclodextrins are reported to have beneficial effects on a variety of health outcome measures from body weight control to allergy suppression. A recent mechanistic study examining the effects of α-cyclodextrin on micelle formation in fed-state simulated intestinal fluid found precipitation of cyclodextrin bound lecithin (159). The results suggest that α-cyclodextrin disrupts cholesterol absorption by precipitating lecithin from bile salt micelles within the intestinal lumen. Mice fed a high cholesterol diet treated with β-cyclodextrin exhibited a reduction in atherosclerotic plaque size and cholesterol crystal deposition in the sub-endothelial space, which promoted plaque regression (160). Further study is needed to determine the efficacy of cyclodextrin in managing atherosclerosis in humans.
Probiotics
Probiotics are microorganisms that, when consumed, promote a beneficial health effect such as Bifidobacterium animalis and Lactobacillus acidophilus. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials examining the effects of probiotics on their lipid lowering effects published between 2000 and 2014 included 15 studies and 788 total subjects (161). The meta-analysis revealed significant reductions in serum total and LDL cholesterol when consuming probiotics as fermented milk or yogurt when compared to consuming probiotics in a capsule. The mechanism for these effects can be attributed, at least partially, to the decrease in intestinal cholesterol absorption through the co-precipitation of cholesterol with de-conjugated bile salts, intestinal conversion of cholesterol to coprostanol, and the inhibition of the expression of the intestinal sterol transporter NPC1L1 (162).
Saponins
Saponins are found mainly in plants but are also present in lower marine animals and some bacteria. Saponins possess a wide range of biological activities and some are known to be toxic. However, the human diet contains appreciable amounts of saponins, particularly in legumes and alfalfa sprouts. Dietary saponins are poorly absorbed, thus suggesting their cholesterol-lowering action occurs in the intestine. One possible mechanism of action is the ability of saponins to form insoluble complexes with cholesterol in the intestinal lumen (163,164). Another possibility is direct binding of saponins to bile acids, which would disrupt micelle formation and, consequently, cholesterol absorption. However, Harwood et al. (165) reported no change in bile acid absorption or interruption of the enterohepatic circulation of bile acids in hamsters fed saponins, despite significant reduction in cholesterol absorption.
CONCLUSION
Many cholesterol-lowering compounds are naturally present in the human food supply. Each of these compounds can be isolated, purified, and subsequently used as additives in food products and dietary supplements designed specifically for reducing plasma LDL cholesterol concentration. This review focused on compounds that lower plasma cholesterol by inhibiting cholesterol absorption in the small intestine, including phytosterols, soluble fibers, phospholipids, and stearic acid. All of these compounds appear to exert their effects by interfering with micellar solubilization of cholesterol within the intestinal lumen. This can be the result of displacing cholesterol from the micelle, binding or precipitating cholesterol, impeding the movement of cholesterol by forming a viscous matrix, inhibiting digestive enzymes, binding bile acids, and decreasing their participation in micelle formation, or downregulating cholesterol transporters within the enterocyte. Stearic acid also appears to work systemically by incorporating into hepatic and biliary phospholipids, which destabilizes micelles and reduces cholesterol solubility. These compounds are attractive to food and nutraceutical companies because, in most cases, they are regulated as foods and not drugs. Most of the compounds work entirely within the intestine and are poorly absorbed, if at all, thus significantly reducing (or eliminating) the risk of toxicity. Some also contribute important functional properties when added to foods, such as emulsification, improved texture, calorie reduction, and in the case of soluble fibers, provide prebiotic action. In view of these desirable characteristics, manufacturers are likely to develop a greater diversity of food and nutraceutical products in the coming years giving consumers more choices to manage their plasma cholesterol levels through nonpharmacological means.
Footnotes
AUTHOR DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Kesäniemi YA, Miettinen TA. Cholesterol absorption efficiency regulates plasma cholesterol level in the Finnish population. Eur J Clin Invest. 1987;17:391–395. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.1987.tb01132.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rudel L, Deckelman C, Wilson M, Scobey M, Anderson R. Dietary cholesterol and downregulation of cholesterol 7 alpha-hydroxylase and cholesterol absorption in African green monkeys. J Clin Invest. 1994;93:2463–2472. doi: 10.1172/JCI117255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gylling H, Miettinen TA. The effect of cholesterol absorption inhibition on low density lipoprotein cholesterol level. Atherosclerosis. 1995;117:305–308. doi: 10.1016/0021-9150(95)05566-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Carr TP, Gallaher DD, Yang CH, Hassel CA. Increased intestinal contents viscosity reduces cholesterol absorption efficiency in hamsters fed hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. J Nutr. 1996;126:1463–1469. doi: 10.1093/jn/126.5.1463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Carr TP, Cornelison RM, Illston BJ, Stuefer-Powell CL, Gallaher DD. Plant sterols alter bile acid metabolism and reduce cholesterol absorption in hamsters fed a beef-based diet. Nutr Res. 2002;22:745–754. doi: 10.1016/S0271-5317(02)00389-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Altmann SW, Davis HR, Jr, Zhu LJ, Yao X, Hoos LM, Tetzloff G, Iyer SP, Maguire M, Golovko A, Zeng M, Wang L, Murgolo N, Graziano MP. Niemann-Pick C1 like 1 protein is critical for intestinal cholesterol absorption. Science. 2004;303:1201–1204. doi: 10.1126/science.1093131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Burnett DA. β-Lactam cholesterol absorption inhibitors. Curr Med Chem. 2004;11:1873–1887. doi: 10.2174/0929867043364865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mc Auley MT, Wilkinson DJ, Jones JJ, Kirkwood TB. A whole-body mathematical model of cholesterol metabolism and its age-associated dysregulation. BMC Syst Biol. 2012;6:130. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-6-130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Briefel RR, Johnson CL. Secular trends in dietary intake in the United States. Annu Rev Nutr. 2004;24:401–431. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.23.011702.073349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Valsta LM, Lemström A, Ovaskainen ML, Lampi AM, Toivo J, Korhonen T, Piironen V. Estimation of plant sterol and cholesterol intake in Finland: quality of new values and their effect on intake. Br J Nutr. 2004;92:671–678. doi: 10.1079/BJN20041234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ishinaga M, Ueda A, Mochizuki T, Sugiyama S, Kobayashi T. Cholesterol intake is associated with lecithin intake in Japanese people. J Nutr. 2005;135:1451–1455. doi: 10.1093/jn/135.6.1451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Grundy SM, Metzger AL. A physiological method for estimation of hepatic secretion of biliary lipids in man. Gastroenterology. 1972;62:1200–1217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Duane WC. Effects of lovastatin and dietary cholesterol on sterol homeostasis in healthy human subjects. J Clin Invest. 1993;92:911–918. doi: 10.1172/JCI116666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yao L, Heubi JE, Buckley DD, Fierra H, Setchell KD, Granholm NA, Tso P, Hui DY, Woollett LA. Separation of micelles and vesicles within lumenal aspirates from healthy humans: solubilization of cholesterol after a meal. J Lipid Res. 2002;43:654–660. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dawson PA, Oelkers P. Bile acid transporters. Curr Opin Lipidol. 1995;6:109–114. doi: 10.1097/00041433-199504000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Packard CJ, Shepherd J. The hepatobiliary axis and lipoprotein metabolism: effects of bile acid sequestrants and ileal bypass surgery. J Lipid Res. 1982;23:1081–1098. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hui DY, Howles PN. Molecular mechanisms of cholesterol absorption and transport in the intestine. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2005;16:183–192. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2005.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Davis HR, Jr, Zhu LJ, Hoos LM, Tetzloff G, Maguire M, Liu J, Yao X, Iyer SP, Lam MH, Lund EG, Detmers PA, Graziano MP, Altmann SW. Niemann-Pick C1 Like 1 (NPC1L1) is the intestinal phytosterol and cholesterol transporter and a key modulator of whole-body cholesterol homeostasis. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:33586–33592. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M405817200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Berge KE, Tian H, Graf GA, Yu L, Grishin NV, Schultz J, Kwiterovich P, Shan B, Barnes R, Hobbs HH. Accumulation of dietary cholesterol in sitosterolemia caused by mutations in adjacent ABC transporters. Science. 2000;290:1771–1775. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5497.1771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lee MH, Lu K, Hazard S, Yu H, Shulenin S, Hidaka H, Kojima H, Allikmets R, Sakuma N, Pegoraro R, Srivastava AK, Salen G, Dean M, Patel SB. Identification of a gene, ABCG5, important in the regulation of dietary cholesterol absorption. Nat Genet. 2001;27:79–83. doi: 10.1038/83799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lee MH, Lu K, Patel SB. Genetic basis of sitosterolemia. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2001;12:141–149. doi: 10.1097/00041433-200104000-00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Singh V, Jain M, Misra A, Khanna V, Rana M, Prakash P, Malasoni R, Dwivedi AK, Dikshit M, Barthwal MK. Curcuma oil ameliorates hyperlipidaemia and associated deleterious effects in golden Syrian hamsters. Br J Nutr. 2013;110:437–446. doi: 10.1017/S0007114512005363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Matthan NR, Lichtenstein AH. Approaches to measuring cholesterol absorption in humans. Atherosclerosis. 2004;174:197–205. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9150(03)00248-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wilson MD, Rudel LL. Review of cholesterol absorption with emphasis on dietary and biliary cholesterol. J Lipid Res. 1994;35:943–955. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Normén AL, Brants HA, Voorrips LE, Andersson HA, van den Brandt PA, Goldbohm RA. Plant sterol intakes and colorectal cancer risk in the Netherlands Cohort Study on Diet and Cancer. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;74:141–148. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/74.1.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Andersson SW, Skinner J, Ellegård L, Welch AA, Bingham S, Mulligan A, Andersson H, Khaw KT. Intake of dietary plant sterols is inversely related to serum cholesterol concentration in men and women in the EPIC Norfolk population: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004;58:1378–1385. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.de Vries JHM, Jansen A, Kromhout D, van de Bovenkamp P, van Staveren WA, Mensink RP, Katan MB. The fatty acid and sterol content of food composites of middle-aged men in seven countries. J Food Compos Anal. 1997;10:115–141. doi: 10.1006/jfca.1997.0525. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sioen I, Matthys C, Huybrechts I, Van Camp J, De Henauw S. Consumption of plant sterols in Belgium: estimated intakes and sources of naturally occurring plant sterols and β-carotene. Br J Nutr. 2011;105:960–966. doi: 10.1017/S0007114510004587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Klingberg S, Ellegård L, Johansson I, Hallmans G, Weinehall L, Andersson H, Winkvist A. Inverse relation between dietary intake of naturally occurring plant sterols and serum cholesterol in northern Sweden. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87:993–1001. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/87.4.993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jiménez-Escrig A, Santos-Hidalgo AB, Saura-Calixto F. Common sources and estimated intake of plant sterols in the Spanish diet. J Agric Food Chem. 2006;54:3462–3471. doi: 10.1021/jf053188k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Vuoristo M, Miettinen TA. Absorption, metabolism, and serum concentrations of cholesterol in vegetarians: effects of cholesterol feeding. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;59:1325–1331. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/59.6.1325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhou BF, Stamler J, Dennis B, Moag-Stahlberg A, Okuda N, Robertson C, Zhao L, Chan Q, Elliott P INTERMAP Research Group. Nutrient intakes of middle-aged men and women in China, Japan, United Kingdom, and United States in the late 1990s: The INTERMAP Study. J Hum Hypertens. 2003;17:623–630. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Law M. Plant sterol and stanol margarines and health. BMJ. 2000;320:861–864. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7238.861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Katan MB, Grundy SM, Jones P, Law M, Miettinen T, Paoletti R Stresa Workshop Participants. Efficacy and safety of plant stanols and sterols in the management of blood cholesterol levels. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78:965–978. doi: 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)63144-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.AbuMweis SS, Barake R, Jones PJH. Plant sterols/ stanols as cholesterol lowering agents: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Food Nutr Res. 2008;52 doi: 10.3402/fnr.v52i0.1811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Demonty I, Ras RT, van der Knaap HC, Duchateau GS, Meijer L, Zock PL, Geleijnse JM, Trautwein EA. Continuous dose-response relationship of the LDL-cholesterol-lowering effect of phytosterol intake. J Nutr. 2009;139:271–284. doi: 10.3945/jn.108.095125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ras RT, Geleijnse JM, Trautwein EA. LDL-cholesterol-lowering effect of plant sterols and stanols across different dose ranges: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled studies. Br J Nutr. 2014;112:214–219. doi: 10.1017/S0007114514000750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nissinen M, Gylling H, Vuoristo M, Miettinen TA. Micellar distribution of cholesterol and phytosterols after duodenal plant stanol ester infusion. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2002;282:G1009–G1015. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00446.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Trautwein EA, Duchateau GSMJE, Lin Y, Mel’nikov SM, Molhuizen HOF, Ntanios FY. Proposed mechanisms of cholesterol-lowering action of plant sterols. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol. 2003;105:171–185. doi: 10.1002/ejlt.200390033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Armstrong MJ, Carey MC. Thermodynamic and molecular determinants of sterol solubilities in bile salt micelles. J Lipid Res. 1987;28:1144–1155. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Brown AW, Hang J, Dussault PH, Carr TP. Plant sterol and stanol substrate specificity of pancreatic cholesterol esterase. J Nutr Biochem. 2010;21:736–740. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2009.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Carden TJ, Hang J, Dussault PH, Carr TP. Dietary plant sterol esters must be hydrolyzed to reduce intestinal cholesterol absorption in hamsters. J Nutr. 2015;145:1402–1407. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.207662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hofmann AF, Small DM. Detergent properties of bile salts: correlation with physiological function. Annu Rev Med. 1967;18:333–376. doi: 10.1146/annurev.me.18.020167.002001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ikeda I, Sugano M. Some aspects of mechanism of inhibition of cholesterol absorption by beta-sitosterol. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1983;732:651–658. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(83)90243-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ikeda I, Tanaka K, Sugano M, Vahouny GV, Gallo LL. Inhibition of cholesterol absorption in rats by plant sterols. J Lipid Res. 1988;29:1573–1582. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ikeda I, Tanabe Y, Sugano M. Effects of sitosterol and sitostanol on micellar solubility of cholesterol. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol. 1989;35:361–369. doi: 10.3177/jnsv.35.361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Jesch ED, Carr TP. Sitosterol reduces micellar cholesterol solubility in model bile. Nutr Res. 2006;26:579–584. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2006.08.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Heinemann T, Kullak-Ublick GA, Pietruck B, von Bergmann K. Mechanisms of action of plant sterols on inhibition of cholesterol absorption. Comparison of sitosterol and sitostanol. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1991;40:S59–S63. doi: 10.1007/BF03216292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mel’nikov SM, Seijen ten Hoorn JWM, Eijkelenboom APAM. Effect of phytosterols and phytostanols on the solubilization of cholesterol by dietary mixed micelles: an in vitro study. Chem Phys Lipids. 2004;127:121–141. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2003.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Christiansen L, Karjalainen M, Seppänen-Laakso T, Hiltunen R, Yliruusi J. Effect of β-sitosterol on precipitation of cholesterol from non-aqueous and aqueous solutions. Int J Pharm. 2003;254:155–166. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(03)00007-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mel’nikov SM, Seijen ten Hoorn JW, Bertrand B. Can cholesterol absorption be reduced by phytosterols and phytostanols via a cocrystallization mechanism? Chem Phys Lipids. 2004;127:15–33. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2003.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Salen G, von Bergmann K, Lütjohann D, Kwiterovich P, Kane J, Patel SB, Musliner T, Stein P, Musser B Multicenter Sitosterolemia Study Group. Ezetimibe effectively reduces plasma plant sterols in patients with sitosterolemia. Circulation. 2004;109:966–971. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000116766.31036.03. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Davies JP, Scott C, Oishi K, Liapis A, Ioannou YA. Inactivation of NPC1L1 causes multiple lipid transport defects and protects against diet-induced hypercholesterolemia. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:12710–12720. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M409110200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tang W, Ma Y, Jia L, Ioannou YA, Davies JP, Yu L. Genetic inactivation of NPC1L1 protects against sitosterolemia in mice lacking ABCG5/ABCG8. J Lipid Res. 2008;50:293–300. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M800439-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Jesch ED, Seo JM, Carr TP, Lee JY. Sitosterol reduces messenger RNA and protein expression levels of Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 in FHs 74 Int cells. Nutr Res. 2009;29:859–866. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2009.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Field FJ, Born E, Mathur SN. Stanol esters decrease plasma cholesterol independently of intestinal ABC sterol transporters and Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 protein gene expression. J Lipid Res. 2004;45:2252–2259. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M400208-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Field FJ, Mathur SN. β-Sitosterol: esterification by intestinal acylcoenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT) and its effect on cholesterol esterification. J Lipid Res. 1983;24:409–417. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Tavani DM, Nes WR, Billheimer JT. The sterol substrate specificity of acyl CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase from rat liver. J Lipid Res. 1982;23:774–781. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Temel RE, Gebre AK, Parks JS, Rudel LL. Compared with acyl-CoA:cholesterol O-acyltransferase (ACAT) 1 and lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase, ACAT2 displays the greatest capacity to differentiate cholesterol from sitosterol. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:47594–47601. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M308235200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes: proposed definition of dietary fiber. The National Academies Press; Washington DC, USA: 2001. pp. 3–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Trumbo P, Schlicker S, Yates AA, Poos M Food and Nutrition Board of the Institute of Medicine, The National Academies. Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein and amino acids. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102:1621–1630. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90346-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.McRorie JW, Jr, McKeown NM. Understanding the physics of functional fibers in the gastrointestinal tract: an evidence-based approach to resolving enduring misconceptions about insoluble and soluble fiber. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017;117:251–264. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.09.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Hsu PK, Chien PJ, Chen CH, Chau CF. Carrot insoluble fiber-rich fraction lowers lipid and cholesterol absorption in hamsters. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 2006;39:338–343. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2005.02.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Meyer KA, Kushi LH, Jacobs DR, Jr, Slavin J, Sellers TA, Folsom AR. Carbohydrates, dietary fiber, and incident type 2 diabetes in older women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71:921–930. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/71.4.921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Bazzano LA. Effects of soluble dietary fiber on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and coronary heart disease risk. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2008;10:473–477. doi: 10.1007/s11883-008-0074-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Threapleton DE, Greenwood DC, Evans CE, Cleghorn CL, Nykjaer C, Woodhead C, Cade JE, Gale CP, Burley VJ. Dietary fibre intake and risk of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013;347:f6879. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Xu R, Ding Z, Zhao P, Tang L, Tang X, Xiao S. The effects of early post-operative soluble dietary fiber enteral nutrition for colon cancer. Nutrients. 2016;8:E584. doi: 10.3390/nu8090584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.van Bennekum AM, Nguyen DV, Schulthess G, Hauser H, Phillips MC. Mechanisms of cholesterol-lowering effects of dietary insoluble fibres: relationships with intestinal and hepatic cholesterol parameters. Br J Nutr. 2005;94:331–337. doi: 10.1079/BJN20051498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Venkatesan N, Devaraj SN, Devaraj H. A fibre cocktail of fenugreek, guar gum and wheat bran reduces oxidative modification of LDL induced by an atherogenic diet in rats. Mol Cell Biochem. 2007;294:145–153. doi: 10.1007/s11010-006-9254-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Anderson JW, Davidson MH, Blonde L, Brown WV, Howard WJ, Ginsberg H, Allgood LD, Weingand KW. Long-term cholesterol-lowering effects of psyllium as an adjunct to diet therapy in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71:1433–1438. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/71.6.1433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Naumann E, van Rees AB, Onning G, Oste R, Wydra M, Mensink RP. β-Glucan incorporated into a fruit drink effectively lowers serum LDL-cholesterol concentrations. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83:601–605. doi: 10.1093/ajcn.83.3.601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Castro IA, Barroso LP, Sinnecker P. Functional foods for coronary heart disease risk reduction: a meta-analysis using a multivariate approach. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82:32–40. doi: 10.1093/ajcn.82.1.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Malhotra A, Shafiq N, Arora A, Singh M, Kumar R, Malhotra S. Dietary interventions (plant sterols, stanols, omega-3 fatty acids, soy protein and dietary fibers) for familial hypercholesterolaemia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001918.pub3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.US Food and Drug Administration. [accessed Mar 2017];Code of Federal Regulations: 21CFR101.76. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=101.76.
- 75.US Food and Drug Administration. [accessed Mar 2017];Code of Federal Regulations: 21CFR101.77. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=101.77.
- 76.Zhu RG, Sun YD, Li TP, Chen G, Peng X, Duan WB, Zheng ZZ, Shi SL, Xu JG, Liu YH, Jin XY. Comparative effects of hawthorn (Crataegus pinnatifida Bunge) pectin and pectin hydrolyzates on the cholesterol homeostasis of hamsters fed high-cholesterol diets. Chem Biol Interact. 2015;238:42–47. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2015.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Bell S, Goldman VM, Bistrian BR, Arnold AH, Ostroff G, Forse RA. Effect of β-glucan from oats and yeast on serum lipids. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1999;39:189–202. doi: 10.1080/10408399908500493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Queenan KM, Stewart ML, Smith KN, Thomas W, Fulcher RG, Slavin JL. Concentrated oat β-glucan, a fermentable fiber, lowers serum cholesterol in hypercholesterolemic adults in a randomized controlled trial. Nutr J. 2007;6:6. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-6-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Schneeman BO. Fiber, inulin and oligofructose: similarities and differences. J Nutr. 1999;129:1424S–1427S. doi: 10.1093/jn/129.7.1424S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Boeckner LS, Schnepf MI, Tungland BC. Inulin: a review of nutritional and health implications. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2001;43:1–63. doi: 10.1016/S1043-4526(01)43002-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Pszczola DE. Plot thickens, as gums add special effects ingredients. Food Technol. 2003;57:34–47. [Google Scholar]
- 82.Khan AR, Khan GY, Mitchel A, Qadeer MA. Effect of guar gum on blood lipids. Am J Clin Nutr. 1981;34:2446–2449. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/34.11.2446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Kelley JJ, Tsai AC. Effect of pectin, gum arabic and agar on cholesterol absorption, synthesis, and turnover in rats. J Nutr. 1978;108:630–639. doi: 10.1093/jn/108.4.630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Pande S, Platel K, Srinivasan K. Antihypercholeste-rolaemic influence of dietary tender cluster beans (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) in cholesterol fed rats. Indian J Med Res. 2012;135:401–406. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Mohamed RE, Gadour MO, Adam I. The lowering effect of Gum Arabic on hyperlipidemia in Sudanese patients. Front Physiol. 2015;6:160. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Kendall CWC, Emam A, Augustin LSA, Jenkins DJA. Resistant starches and health. J AOAC Int. 2004;87:769–774. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Haub MD, Hubach KL, Al-tamimi EK, Ornelas S, Seib PA. Different types of resistant starch elicit different glucose reponses in humans. J Nutr Metab (Online) 2010 doi: 10.1155/2010/230501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Martínez I, Kim J, Duffy PR, Schlegel VL, Walter J. Resistant starches types 2 and 4 have differential effects on the composition of the fecal microbiota in human subjects. PLoS One. 2010;5:e15046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Nichenametla SN, Weidauer LA, Wey HE, Beare TM, Specker BL, Dey M. Resistant starch type 4-enriched diet lowered blood cholesterols and improved body composition in a double blind controlled cross-over intervention. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2014;58:1365–1369. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201300829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Kuo SM. The interplay between fiber and the intestinal microbiome in the inflammatory response. Adv Nutr. 2013;4:16–28. doi: 10.3945/an.112.003046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Hamaker BR, Tuncil YE. A perspective on the complexity of dietary fiber structures and their potential effect on the gut microbiota. J Mol Biol. 2014;426:3838–3850. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.07.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Yamaoka I, Kikuchi T, Endo N, Ebisu G. Fluorescence imaging in vivo visualizes delayed gastric emptying of liquid enteral nutrition containing pectin. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014;14:168. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Kang J, Lee J, Kwon D, Song Y. Effect of Opuntia humifusa supplementation and acute exercise on insulin sensitivity and associations with PPAR-γ and PGC-1α protein expression in skeletal muscle of rats. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:7140–7154. doi: 10.3390/ijms14047140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Grube B, Chong PW, Lau KZ, Orzechowski HD. A natural fiber complex reduces body weight in the overweight and obese: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Obesity. 2013;21:58–64. doi: 10.1002/oby.20244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Parnell JA, Reimer RA. Effect of prebiotic fibre supplementation on hepatic gene expression and serum lipids: a dose-response study in JCR:LA-cp rats. Br J Nutr. 2010;103:1577–1584. doi: 10.1017/S0007114509993539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Vahouny GV, Satchithanandam S, Chen I, Tepper SA, Kritchevsky D, Lightfoot FG, Cassidy MM. Dietary fiber and intestinal adaptation: effects on lipid absorption and lymphatic transport in the rat. Am J Clin Nutr. 1988;47:201–206. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/47.2.201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Ebihara K, Schneeman BO. Interaction of bile acids, phospholipids, cholesterol and triglyceride with dietary fibers in the small intestine of rats. J Nutr. 1989;119:1100–1106. doi: 10.1093/jn/119.8.1100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Miettinen TA, Tarpila S. Serum lipids and cholesterol metabolism during guar gum, plantago ovata and high fibre treatments. Clin Chim Acta. 1989;183:253–262. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(89)90359-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Evans AJ, Hood RL, Oakenfull DG, Sidhu GS. Relationship between structure and function of dietary fibre: a comparative study of the effects of three galactomannans on cholesterol metabolism in the rat. Br J Nutr. 1992;68:217–229. doi: 10.1079/BJN19920079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Mathé D, Lutton C, Rautureau J, Coste T, Gouffier E, Sulpice JC, Chevallier F. Effects of dietary fiber and salt mixtures on the cholesterol metabolism of rats. J Nutr. 1977;107:466–474. doi: 10.1093/jn/107.3.466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Fernandez ML, Lin EC, Trejo A, McNamara DJ. Prickly pear (Opuntia sp.) pectin alters hepatic cholesterol metabolism without affecting cholesterol absorption in guinea pigs fed a hypercholesterolemic diet. J Nutr. 1994;124:817–824. doi: 10.1093/jn/124.6.817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Johnson IT, Gee JM. Effect of gel-forming gums on the intestinal unstirred layer and sugar transport in vitro. Gut. 1981;22:398–403. doi: 10.1136/gut.22.5.398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Flourie B, Vidon N, Florent CH, Bernier JJ. Effect of pectin on jejunal glucose absorption and unstirred layer thickness in normal man. Gut. 1984;25:936–941. doi: 10.1136/gut.25.9.936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Turley SD, Daggy BP, Dietschy JM. Cholesterol-lowering action of psyllium mucilloid in the hamster: sites and possible mechanisms of action. Metabolism. 1991;40:1063–1073. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(91)90131-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Turley SD, Daggy BP, Dietschy JM. Psyllium augments the cholesterol-lowering action of cholestyramine in hamsters by enhancing sterol loss from the liver. Gastroenterology. 1994;107:444–452. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(94)90170-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Eckhardt ER, Wang DQ, Donovan JM, Carey MC. Dietary sphingomyelin suppresses intestinal cholesterol absorption by decreasing thermodynamic activity of cholesterol monomers. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:948–956. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.32539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Yeagle PL, Hutton WC, Huang CH, Martin RB. Structure in the polar head region of phospholipid bilayers: a 31P {1H} nuclear Overhauser effect study. Biochemistry. 1976;15:2121–2124. doi: 10.1021/bi00655a014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Demel RA, Jansen JWCM, van Dijck PWM, van Deenen LLM. The preferential interactions of cholesterol with different classes of phospholipids. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1977;465:1–10. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(77)90350-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.McIntosh TJ, Simon SA, Needham D, Huang CH. Structure and cohesive properties of sphingomyelin/cholesterol bilayers. Biochemistry. 1992;31:2012–2020. doi: 10.1021/bi00122a017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Rampone AJ. Bile salt and non-bile salt components in bile affecting micellar cholesterol uptake by rat intestine in vitro. J Physiol. 1972;227:889–898. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp010064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Rampone AJ. The effect of lecithin on intestinal cholesterol uptake by rat intestine in vitro. J Physiol. 1973;229:505–514. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Beil FU, Grundy SM. Studies on plasma lipoproteins during absorption of exogenous lecithin in man. J Lipid Res. 1980;21:525–536. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Kesaniemi YA, Grundy SM. Effects of dietary polyenylphosphatidylcholine on metabolism of cholesterol and triglycerides in hypertriglyceridemic patients. Am J Clin Nutr. 1986;43:98–107. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/43.1.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Koo SI, Noh SK. Phosphatidylcholine inhibits and lysophosphatidylcholine enhances the lymphatic absorption of α-tocopherol in adult rats. J Nutr. 2001;131:717–722. doi: 10.1093/jn/131.3.717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Jiang Y, Noh SK, Koo SI. Egg phosphatidylcholine decreases the lymphatic absorption of cholesterol in rats. J Nutr. 2001;131:2358–2363. doi: 10.1093/jn/131.9.2358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Nyberg L, Duan RD, Nilsson A. A mutual inhibitory effect on absorption of sphingomyelin and cholesterol. J Nutr Biochem. 2000;11:244–249. doi: 10.1016/S0955-2863(00)00069-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Noh SK, Koo SI. Egg sphingomyelin lowers the lymphatic absorption of cholesterol and α-tocopherol in rats. J Nutr. 2003;133:3571–3576. doi: 10.1093/jn/133.11.3571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Noh SK, Koo SI. Milk sphingomyelin is more effective than egg sphingomyelin in inhibiting intestinal absorption of cholesterol and fat in rats. J Nutr. 2004;134:2611–2616. doi: 10.1093/jn/134.10.2611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Chung RW, Kamili A, Tandy S, Weir JM, Gaire R, Wong G, Meikle PJ, Cohn JS, Rye KA. Dietary sphingomyelin lowers hepatic lipid levels and inhibits intestinal cholesterol absorption in high-fat-fed mice. PLoS One. 2013;8:e55949. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Duivenvoorden I, Voshol PJ, Rensen PC, van Duyvenvoorde W, Romijn JA, Emeis JJ, Havekes LM, Nieuwenhuizen WF. Dietary sphingolipids lower plasma cholesterol and triacylglycerol and prevent liver steatosis in APOE*3Leiden mice. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84:312–321. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/84.1.312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Ohlsson L, Burling H, Nilsson A. Long term effects on human plasma lipoproteins of a formulation enriched in butter milk polar lipid. Lipids Health Dis. 2009;8:44. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-8-44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Ramprasath VR, Jones PJ, Buckley DD, Woollett LA, Heubi JE. Effect of dietary sphingomyelin on absorption and fractional synthetic rate of cholesterol and serum lipid profile in humans. Lipids Health Dis. 2013;12:125. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-12-125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Borgström B. Importance of phospholipids, pancreatic phospholipase A2, and fatty acid for the digestion of dietary fat: in vitro experiments with the porcine enzymes. Gastroenterology. 1980;78:954–962. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Patton JS, Carey MC. Inhibition of human pancreatic lipase-colipase activity by mixed bile salt-phospholipid micelles. Am J Physiol. 1981;241:G328–G336. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1981.241.4.G328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Young SC, Hui DY. Pancreatic lipase/colipase-mediated triacylglycerol hydrolysis is required for cholesterol transport from lipid emulsions to intestinal cells. Biochem J. 1999;339:615–620. doi: 10.1042/bj3390615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Homan R, Hamelehle KL. Phospholipase A2 relieves phosphatidylcholine inhibition of micellar cholesterol absorption and transport by human intestinal cell line Caco-2. J Lipid Res. 1998;39:1197–1209. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.van Dijck PW. Negatively charged phospholipids and their position in the cholesterol affinity sequence. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979;555:89–101. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(79)90074-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Halling KK, Ramstedt B, Nyström JH, Slotte JP, Nyholm TKM. Cholesterol interactions with fluid-phase phospholipids: effect on the lateral organization of the bilayer. Biophys J. 2008;95:3861–3871. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.108.133744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Engberg O, Hautala V, Yasuda T, Dehio H, Murata M, Slotte JP, Nyholm TKM. The affinity of cholesterol for different phospholipids affects lateral segregation in bilayers. Biophys J. 2016;111:546–556. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.06.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Garmy N, Taïeb N, Yahi N, Fantini J. Interaction of cholesterol with sphingosine: physicochemical characterization and impact on intestinal absorption. J Lipid Res. 2004;46:36–45. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M400199-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Zhang P, Chen Y, Cheng Y, Hertervig E, Ohlsson L, Nilsson A, Duan RD. Alkaline sphingomyelinase (NPP7) promotes cholesterol absorption by affecting sphingomyelin levels in the gut: a study with NPP7 knockout mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2014;306:G903–G908. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00319.2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Bhattacharyya DK. Lesser-known Indian plant sources for fats and oils. Inform. 2002;13:151–157. [Google Scholar]
- 133.Keys A, Anderson JT, Grande F. Serum cholesterol response to changes in the diet: IV. Particular saturated fatty acids in the diet. Metabolism. 1965;14:776–787. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(65)90004-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Hegsted DM, McGandy RB, Myers ML, Stare FJ. Quantitative effects of dietary fat on serum cholesterol in man. Am J Clin Nutr. 1965;17:281–295. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/17.5.281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Hunter JE, Zhang J, Kris-Etherton PM. Cardiovascular disease risk of dietary stearic acid compared with trans, other saturated, and unsaturated fatty acids: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91:46–63. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Grundy SM, Denke MA. Dietary influences on serum lipids and lipoproteins. J Lipid Res. 1990;31:1149–1172. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Kris-Etherton PM, Yu S. Individual fatty acid effects on plasma lipids and lipoproteins: human studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65:1628S–1644S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/65.5.1628S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Krauss RM, Eckel RH, Howard B, Appel LJ, Daniels SR, Deckelbaum RJ, Erdman JW, Jr, Kris-Etherton P, Goldberg IJ, Kotchen TA, Lichtenstein AH, Mitch WE, Mullis R, Robinson K, Wylie-Rosett J, St Jeor S, Suttie J, Tribble DL, Bazzarre TL. AHA Dietary Guidelines: revision 2000: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Nutrition Committee of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2000;102:2284–2299. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.102.18.2284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Feldman EB, Russell BS, Schnare FH, Moretti-Rojas I, Miles BC, Doyle EA. Effects of diets of homogeneous saturated triglycerides on cholesterol balance in rats. J Nutr. 1979;109:2237–2246. doi: 10.1093/jn/109.12.2237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Feldman EB, Russell BS, Schnare FH, Miles BC, Doyle EA, Moretti-Rojas I. Effects of tristearin, triolein and safflower oil diets on cholesterol balance in rats. J Nutr. 1979;109:2226–2236. doi: 10.1093/jn/109.12.2226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Chen IS, Subramaniam S, Vahouny GV, Cassidy MM, Ikeda I, Kritchevsky D. A comparison of the digestion and absorption of cocoa butter and palm kernel oil and their effects on cholesterol absorption in rats. J Nutr. 1989;119:1569–1573. doi: 10.1093/jn/119.11.1569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Ikeda I, Imasato Y, Nakayama M, Imaizumi K, Sugano M. Lymphatic transport of stearic acid and its effect on cholesterol transport in rats. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol. 1994;40:275–282. doi: 10.3177/jnsv.40.275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Schneider CL, Cowles RL, Stuefer-Powell CL, Carr TP. Dietary stearic acid reduces cholesterol absorption and increases endogenous cholesterol excretion in hamsters fed cereal-based diets. J Nutr. 2000;130:1232–1238. doi: 10.1093/jn/130.5.1232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Imaizumi K, Abe K, Kuroiwa C, Sugano M. Fat containing stearic acid increases fecal neutral steroid excretion and catabolism of low density lipoproteins without affecting plasma cholesterol concentration in hamsters fed a cholesterol-containing diet. J Nutr. 1993;123:1693–1702. doi: 10.1093/jn/123.10.1693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Kamei M, Ohgaki S, Kanbe T, Niiya I, Mizutani H, Matsui-Yuasa I, Otani S, Morita S. Effects of highly hydrogenated soybean oil and cholesterol on plasma, liver cholesterol, and fecal steroids in rats. Lipids. 1995;30:533–539. doi: 10.1007/BF02537028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Schmidt K, Gallaher D. Reduced cholesterol absorption and intestinal solubilization by stearic acid-rich fats in rats. Abstract No A 378 presented at Experimental Biology 97; New Orleans, LA, USA. 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 147.Wang S, Koo SI. Plasma clearance and hepatic utilization of stearic, myristic and linoleic acids introduced via chylomicrons in rats. Lipids. 1993;28:697–703. doi: 10.1007/BF02535989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Wang S, Koo S. Evidence for distinct metabolic utilization of stearic acid in comparison with palmitic and oleic acids in rats. J Nutr Biochem. 1993;4:594–601. doi: 10.1016/0955-2863(93)90028-U. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Cohen DE, Carey MC. Acyl chain unsaturation modulates distribution of lecithin molecular species between mixed micelles and vesicles in model bile. Implications for particle structure and metastable cholesterol solubilities. J Lipid Res. 1991;32:1291–1302. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Cowles RL, Lee JY, Gallaher DD, Stuefer-Powell CL, Carr TP. Dietary stearic acid alters gallbladder bile acid composition in hamsters fed cereal-based diets. J Nutr. 2002;132:3119–3122. doi: 10.1093/jn/131.10.3119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Hassel CA, Mensing EA, Gallaher DD. Dietary stearic acid reduces plasma and hepatic cholesterol concentrations without increasing bile acid excretion in cholesterol-fed hamsters. J Nutr. 1997;127:1148–1155. doi: 10.1093/jn/127.6.1148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Oishi K, Yamamoto S, Itoh N, Nakao R, Yasumoto Y, Tanaka K, Kikuchi Y, Fukudome S, Okita K, Takano-Ishikawa Y. Wheat alkylresorcinols suppress high-fat, high-sucrose diet-induced obesity and glucose intolerance by increasing insulin sensitivity and cholesterol excretion in male mice. J Nutr. 2015;145:199–206. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.202754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Horikawa K, Hashimoto C, Kikuchi Y, Makita M, Fukudome SI, Okita K, Wada N, Oishi K. Wheat alkylresorcinols reduce micellar solubility of cholesterol in vitro and increase cholesterol excretion in mice. Nat Prod Res. 2017;31:578–582. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2016.1198347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Castaño G, Mas R, Fernández L, Illnait J, Mesa M, Alvarez E, Lezcay M. Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of policosanol with atorvastatin in elderly patients with type II hypercholesterolaemia. Drugs Aging. 2003;20:153–163. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200320020-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Torres O, Agramonte AJ, Illnait J, Más Ferreiro R, Fernández L, Fernández JC. Treatment of hypercholesterolemia in NIDDM with policosanol. Diabetes Care. 1995;18:393–397. doi: 10.2337/diacare.18.3.393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Swanson B, Keithley JK, Sha BE, Fogg L, Nerad J, Novak RM, Adeyemi O, Spear GT. Policosanol for managing human immunodeficiency virus-related dyslipidemia in a medically underserved population: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Altern Ther Health Med. 2011;17:30–35. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Vyas KY, Bedarkar P, Galib R, Prajapati PK. Comparative anti-hyperlipidaemic activity of Nav īna (fresh) and Purāṇa (old) Guggulu. Anc Sci Life. 2015;35:101–109. doi: 10.4103/0257-7941.171672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Urizar NL, Liverman AB, Dodds DT, Silva FV, Ordentlich P, Yan Y, Gonzalez FJ, Heyman RA, Mangelsdorf DJ, Moore DD. A natural product that lowers cholesterol as an antagonist ligand for FXR. Science. 2002;296:1703–1706. doi: 10.1126/science.1072891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Furune T, Ikuta N, Ishida Y, Okamoto H, Nakata D, Terao K, Sakamoto N. A study on the inhibitory mechanism for cholesterol absorption by α-cyclodextrin administration. Beilstein J Org Chem. 2014;10:2827–2835. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.10.300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Zimmer S, Grebe A, Bakke SS, Bode N, Halvorsen B, Ulas T, Skjelland M, De Nardo D, Labzin L, Kerksiek A, Hempel C, Heneka MT, Hawxhurst V, Fitzgerald ML, Trebicka J, Björkhem I, Gustafsson JÅ, Westerterp M, Tall AR, Wright SD, Espevik T, Schultze JL, Nickenig G, Lütjohann D, Latz E. Cyclodextrin promotes atherosclerosis regression via macrophage reprogramming. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8:333ra50. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad6100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Sun J, Buys N. Effects of probiotics consumption on lowering lipids and CVD risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Med. 2015;47:430–440. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2015.1071872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Reis SA, Conceição LL, Rosa DD, Siqueira NP, Peluzio MCG. Mechanisms responsible for the hypocholesterolaemic effect of regular consumption of probiotics. Nutr Res Rev. 2016;30:36–49. doi: 10.1017/S0954422416000226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Gestetner B, Assa Y, Henis Y, Tencer Y, Rotman M, Birk Y, Bondi A. Interaction of lucerne saponins with sterols. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1972;270:181–187. doi: 10.1016/0005-2760(72)90190-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Vinarova L, Vinarov Z, Atanasov V, Pantcheva I, Tcholakova S, Denkov N, Stoyanov S. Lowering of cholesterol bioaccessibility and serum concentrations by saponins: in vitro and in vivo studies. Food Funct. 2015;6:501–512. doi: 10.1039/C4FO00785A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Harwood HJ, Jr, Chandler CE, Pellarin LD, Bangerter FW, Wilkins RW, Long CA, Cosgrove PG, Malinow MR, Marzetta CA, Pettini JL, Savoy YE, Mayne JT. Pharmacologic consequences of cholesterol absorption inhibition: alteration in cholesterol metabolism and reduction in plasma cholesterol concentration induced by the synthetic saponin β-tigogenin cellobioside (CP-88818; tiqueside) J Lipid Res. 1993;34:377–395. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]