Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 21;8(24):39658–39672. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17340

Table 1. General characteristics of included studies.

Author Publication year Country No. of patients Trial design Therapy Marker Treg sites Method Cut -off Follow up months, median
(range)
Outcome
measured
NOS
Esther et al. 2006 UK 69 RC LT FoxP3+ IT IHC 0;1–2;3–10;≥ 10/5HPF 39.6 (2.4–202.8) DFS 7
Fu et al. 2007 China 75 RC Resection CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ PB FCM ≥ Mean NR OS 5
Kobayashi et al. 2007 Japan 147 RC Resection FoxP3+ IT IHC ≥ Median 52.8 (0.5–169.1) OS, DFS 6
Gao et al. 2007 China 302 RC Resection FoxP3+ IT IHC ≥ Median 58 (2.0–109.0) OS, DFS 7
Sasaki et al. 2008 Japan 164 RC Resection FoxP3+ IT, PT IHC ≥ 14/10HPF 55.5 (2.0–184.0) DFS 7
Gao et al. 2008 China 240 RC Resection FoxP3+ IT IHC Not applicable 16.0 (1.5–68.0) OS, DFS 7
Ju et al. 2009 China 207 RC Resection FoxP3+ PT IHC ≥ Median 27.9 (1.5–77.0) OS, DFS 7
Zhou et al. 2009 China 121 RC Resection FoxP3+ IT IHC ≥ Median NR OS, DFS 5
Ju et al. 2009 China 130 RC Resection FoxP3+ PT IHC ≥ Mean 31.8 ± 1.7 (1.5–77.0) OS, RFS 7
Wang et al. 2010 China 140 RC Resection FoxP3+ IT IHC Not applicable NR Not applicable 5
Lin et al. 2010 China 102 RC Resection FoxP3+ IT IHC ≥ Mean 36.0 (1.0–84.0) OS 7
Zhou et al. 2010 China 111 PC Cryoablation CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ PB FCM ≥ Median 12 DFS 4
Chen et al. 2011 China 293 RC Resection FoxP3+ IT IHC ≥ 6.6/HPF NR OS, DFS 5
Shen et al. 2011 China 76 PC Resection FoxP3+ IT IHC ≥ 27/5HPF 12 (9.0–19.0) OS, DFS 7
Chen et al. 2012 China 141 RC Resection FoxP3+ IT, PT IHC ≥ Median 22.7 (2.0–70.3) OS, DFS 7
Li et al. 2012 China 122 PC TACE CD4+CD25+CD127– PB FCM ≥ 6.7/HPF NR OS 6
Huang et al. 2012 China 55 RC Resection FoxP3+ IT, PT IHC ≥ 10.8/HPF; ≥ 1.4/HPF 21 (2–49) OS, DFS 7
Wang et al. 2012 China 137 RC Resection,
RFA, TAE
CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ IT, PB IHC, FCM ≥ 14.55/HPF,
≥ Median
27.5 (2–49) OS, DFS 7
Lin et al. 2013 China 245 RC Resection FoxP3+ IT IHC Not applicable NR OS, DFS 4
Huang et al. 2014 China 56 RC Resection FoxP3+ IT IHC ≥ Median 36 (2–73) OS, DFS 6
Li et al. 2014 China 264 RC TACE CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ PB FCM ≥ Mean NR OS 6
Zhou et al. 2016 China 49 RC Resection CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ PB FCM ≥ 5.07% NR DFS 7
Wang et al. 2016 China 141 RC Resection CD4+FoxP3+ IT IHC Not applicable NR OS, DFS 4
Wang et al. 2016 US 64 PC Resection FoxP3+ IT PCR Not applicable 48.2 OS 5
Tu et al. 2016 China 57 RC Resection FoxP3+ IT IHC ≥ 3.2/HPF NR OS 4
Fu et al. 2016 China 348 RC Resection FoxP3+ IT IHC Not applicable 53.4 (1.5–61.3) DFS 6
Cai et al. 2016 China 324 RC Resection FoxP3+ IT, PT IHC Not applicable 61.03 (2–82.33) OS, DFS 6

LT, liver transplantation; IHC, immunohistochemistry; FCM, flow cytometry; WB, western blot; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PC, prospective cohort; RC, retrospective cohort

IT, intratumoral; PT, peritumoral; PB, peripheral blood; NR, not reported; OS: overall survival; DFS: disease-free survival; HPF, high-power field median/mean value was defined as the ratio of corresponding tumor islet and stroma counts.