Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Jul;18(7):667–674. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001171

Table 2.

High frequency ventilation vs. conventional mechanical ventilation for lung rest–demographics and clinical characteristics

Characteristic Data Available
N (%)
Overall
N = 3040
HFV
N = 363
CMV
N = 2677
Gestational age (weeks) 2783 (91.5) 39 (38, 40) 39 (38, 40) 39 (38, 40)
Birth weight (kg) 2783 (91.5) 3.3 (2.9, 3.7) 3.34 (3, 3.8) 3.3 (2.9, 3.7)
Female gender (%) 3021 (99.4) 1299 (43) 171 (47) 1128 (42)
APGAR < 5 at 5 min (%) 2666 (87.7) 492 (18.5) 56 (18) 436 (18)
Day of life at time of ECMO initiation 3040 (100) 2 (1, 3) 2 (1, 3) 2 (1, 3)
Hours of mechanical ventilation prior to ECMO 2913 (95.8) 33 (17, 62.5) 34 (18, 63) 33 (17, 62)
CMV ventilator type pre-ECMO (%) 2796 (92) 929 (30.6) 15 (4.4) 914 (37)a
pH 2978 (98) 7.21 (7.1, 7.31) 7.18 (7.07, 7.29) 7.22 (7.1, 7.32)a
RSS (MAP * FiO2) 2441 (80) 18 (15, 22) 20 (17, 23) 18 (15, 21)a
Oxygenation index 2409 (79) 48 (34, 68) 54 (39, 77) 47 (33, 67)a
MBP prior to ECMO (mmHg) 1995 (65.6) 43 (36, 52) 40 (34, 49) 44 (36, 52)a
Pump flow at 24h on ECMO (ml/kg/min) 2853 (93.8) 107 (95, 125) 106 (95, 125) 107 (95, 126)
VV ECMO (%) 3024 (99.5) 1204 (39.8) 130 (36) 1074 (40)a

Data presented as median (interquartile ranges) or number (percentage);

a

P < 0.05

High frequency ventilation (HFV); conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV); extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); respiratory severity score (RSS); mean airway pressure (MAP); fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2); mean arterial blood pressure (MBP); venovenous (VV)