Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Jul;18(7):667–674. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001171

Table 3.

High frequency ventilation vs. conventional mechanical ventilation for lung rest–duration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and mechanical ventilation after decannulation in survivors

Characteristic Data Available
N (%)
Overall
N = 2354
HFV
N = 259
CMV
N = 2095
Adjusted Odds Ratio
(95% CI)
ECMO hours in survivors [median (IQR)] 2328 (98.9) 128 (93, 183) 150.5 (111, 222) 126 (92, 178) 1.52 (1.02, 2.3)a
Adjusted ECMO hours in survivors (mean ± SEM) 150.2 ± 0.05 125 ± 0.02 b
Hours of mechanical ventilation after decannulation in survivors [median (IQR)] 1841 (78.2) 106 (56, 189) 134 (84, 242) 100 (52, 178) 1.9 (1.2, 2.9)a
Adjusted duration of mechanical ventilation after decannulation in survivors (mean ± SEM) 135 ± 0.09 100.2 ± 0.03b
a

P < 0.05

b

P < 0.01

The variables included in the model: gestational age, birth weight, age at time of initiation of ECMO, APGAR score of less than 5 at 5 minutes, duration of mechanical ventilation prior to ECMO initiation, RSS, OI, pH, MBP, ECMO pump flow at 24 hours after ECMO initiation, and ECMO mode.

HFV, high frequency ventilation; CMV, conventional mechanical ventilation; CI, confidence interval; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; IQR, interquartile range; SEM, standard error of mean; RSS, respiratory severity score; OI, oxygenation index