. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.

Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2018 Jan;22(1):287–296. doi: 10.1007/s10461-017-1680-2

Table II.

Analyses of primary outcome, retention with viral load suppression ^a for DOT-cART versus control at 12 and 24 months

	N	N clusters	DOT- cART, n with outcome (%)	No DOT- cART, n with outcome (%)	Unadjusted predicted probability (95 % CI)		p- value	Adjusted predicted probability (95% CI)		p- value

					DOT-cART	No DOT-cART		DOT-cART	No DOT-cART
12 months
Intention to treat	339	69	152 (79.6)	108 (73.0)	0.80 (0.75, 0.84)	0.73 (0.66, 0.79)	0.10	0.81 (0.68, 0.90)^b,c	0.73 (0.57, 0.85)^b,c	0.08
Per protocol	319	68	143 (81.7)	105 (72.9)	0.82 (0.76, 0.86)	0.73 (0.66, 0.79)	0.05	0.83 (0.69, 0.92)^d,e	0.73 (0.55, 0.86)^d,e	0.02
As treated	337	69	145 (81.9)	115 (71.9)	0.82 (0.76, 0.86)	0.72 (0.65, 0.78)	0.03	0.83 (0.70, 0.91)^d,f	0.73 (0.55, 0.85)^d,f	0.01
24 months
Intention to treat	337	71	140 (74.1)	100 (67.6)	0.74 (0.67, 0.80)	0.68 (0.59, 0.75)	0.20	0.76 (0.61, 0.87)^b,g	0.68 (0.52, 0.81)^b,g	0.19
Per protocol	316	70	132 (76.3)	98 (68.5)	0.77 (0.69, 0.83)	0.69 (0.60, 0.76)	0.15	0.79 (0.62, 0.89)^d,h	0.70 (0.50, 0.83)^d,h	0.13
As treated	335	71	133 (76.0)	107 (66.9)	0.76 (0.69, 0.83)	0.67 (0.59, 0.74)	0.07	0.78 (0.62, 0.88)^d,i	0.68 (0.50, 0.82)^d,i	0.07

Viral load suppression was defined as viral load < 400 copies.

Adjusting for baseline CD4 cell count (continuous), food insecurity category, any substance use disorder, no full time employment, depression and place of origin (originally from Lima versus outside of Lima).

N=306, 68 clusters.

Adjusting for baseline CD4 cell count (continuous), food insecurity category, any substance use disorder, no full time employment, depression, place of origin (originally from Lima versus outside of Lima), and baseline stigma score.

N=288, 66 clusters.

N=304, 67 clusters.

N=302, 69 clusters.

N=283, 67 clusters.

ⁱ

N=300, 68 clusters.