Table 2.
Distribution of CQ treatment efficacy in Kolkata and Purulia during 2008–2009.
| Year | ACPR |
ETF |
LTF |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kolkata | Purulia | Kolkata | Purulia | Kolkata |
Purulia |
|||
| Recrud-escence | New infection | Recrud-escence | New infection | |||||
| 2008 | 38 (61.29%) | 41 (54.67%) | 18 (29.03%) | 28 (37.33%) | 5 (8.06%) | 1 (1.62%) | 6 (8.0%) | 0 (0.00%) |
| 2009 | 40 (53.33%) | 67 (53.17%) | 25 (33.33%) | 43 (34.13%) | 8 (10.67%) | 2 (2.67%) | 11 (8.73%) | 5 (3.97%) |
| Total | 78 (56.93%) | 108 (53.73%) | 43 (31.39%) | 71 (35.32%) | 13 (9.49%) | 3 (2.19%) | 17 (8.46%) | 5 (2.49%) |