Table 2.
Summary of the readout data, along with the number and type of errors encountered in the reads.
| Block (length) | Number of reads | Sequencing Coverage depth | Number of errors: (substitution, insertion, deletion) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average | Maximum | Per read (average) | Consensus | |||
| Nanopolish | Our method | |||||
| 1 (1,000) | 201 | 176.145 | 192 | (107, 14, 63) | (14, 32, 5) | (0, 0, 2) |
| 2 (1,000) | 407 | 315.521 | 349 | (123, 12, 70) | (75, 99, 40) | (0, 0, 0) |
| 3 (1,000) | 490 | 460.375 | 482 | (80, 23, 42) | (10, 45, 0) | (0, 0, 0) |
| 4 (1,000) | 100 | 81.763 | 87 | (69, 18, 37) | (1, 54, 1) | (0, 0, 0) |
| 5 (1,000) | 728 | 688.663 | 716 | (88, 20, 48) | (4, 45, 3) | (0, 0, 0) |
| 6 (1,000) | 136 | 120.907 | 129 | (79, 21, 42) | (390, 102, 61) | (0, 0, 0) |
| 7 (1,000) | 577 | 542.78 | 566 | (83, 26, 41) | (3, 31, 3) | (0, 0, 0) |
| 8 (1,000) | 217 | 199.018 | 207 | (83, 20, 46) | (18, 51, 1) | (0, 0, 0) |
| 9 (1,000) | 86 | 56.828 | 75 | (60, 16, 30) | (404, 92, 54) | (0, 0, 0) |
| 10 (1,000) | 442 | 396.742 | 427 | (91, 18, 52) | (388, 100, 59) | (0, 0, 0) |
| 11 (1,000) | 114 | 101.826 | 110 | (79, 23, 42) | (16, 23, 18) | (0, 0, 0) |
| 12 (1,000) | 174 | 162.559 | 169 | (94, 23, 50) | (14, 59, 1) | (0, 0, 0) |
| 13 (1,060) | 378 | 352.35 | 366 | (88, 26, 44) | (7, 55, 4) | (0, 0, 0) |
| 14 (1,000) | 222 | 189.918 | 203 | (69, 22, 34) | (15, 34, 3) | (0, 0, 0) |
| 15 (1,000) | 236 | 222.967 | 232 | (92, 24, 45) | (15, 46, 2) | (0, 0, 0) |
| 16 (1,000) | 198 | 182.99 | 195 | (103, 16, 61) | (15, 62, 4) | (0, 0, 1) |
| 17 (880) | 254 | 240.273 | 250 | (77, 19, 42) | (359, 95, 44) | (0, 0, 0) |