177 men with PI-RADS 3+ targets, most biopsy naïve (24) |
Direct |
36% (64/177) |
106 men with ≈ PI-RADS 4+ targets and prior negative transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy (25) |
Direct |
37% (39/106) |
176 men with ≈PI-RADS 3+ and prior negative transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy (26) |
Direct |
73% (202/277) |
142 biopsy naïve men with PI-RADS 3+ targets (17) |
Direct |
70% (99/142) |
Second subcohort of 25 men with ≈ PI-RADS 4+ targets, most with prior negative transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy (data in this paper) |
Direct |
84% (21/25) |
1,003 men with ≈PI-RADS 3+ targets, most with prior negative transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy (5) |
Fusion |
47% (469/1003) |
104 men with ≈PI-RADS 4+ targets and prior negative transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy (25) |
Fusion |
39% (41/104) |
825 men with ≈PI-RADS 3+ targets, mix of biopsy naïve and prior transrectal ultrasound guided positive and negative (27) |
Fusion |
53% (434/825) |