Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 10;7:5014. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04575-y

Table 5.

Results from LMMs investigating how provisioning rates and dietary sources fed to nestlings varied across the three study sites.

Response variable
Explanatory variable Estimate Std. Error df t value P value
(a) Visits per nestling (log)
  Intercept 1.35 0.18 16.7 7.41 <0.001
  Site 0.25 0.08 14.9 3.05 0.008
  Time of day −0.12 0.02 169.9 −6.75 <0.001
(b) Visits per nest
  Intercept 28.34 3.43 16.6 8.27 <0.001
  Site −3.29 1.52 15.0 −2.16 0.047
  Time of day −2.12 0.31 169.7 −6.74 <0.001
(c) Mean volume of caterpillars (log)
  Intercept 5.23 0.30 14.8 17.57 <0.001
  Site −0.33 0.14 14.9 −2.43 0.028
(d) Amount of caterpillars
  Intercept 24.59 2.43 16.4 10.11 <0.001
  Site −6.51 1.08 15.0 −6.01 <0.001
  Time of day −0.64 0.21 169.6 −3.07 0.003
(e) Amount of other arthropods (log)
  Intercept 1.16 0.38 25.6 3.08 <0.001
  Time of day −0.20 0.08 46.7 −2.63 <0.011
(f) Amount of unidentified items
  Intercept 1.60 1.23 27.4 1.30 0.206
  Site 1.97 0.47 13.8 4.23 0.001
  Time of day −0.74 0.28 46.1 −2.63 0.012

In all models, site, time of day and date were included as fixed effects, and dropped if not significant via backward selection (only significant variables are shown). Nest-box (brood) was included as random factor. We indicate in brackets whether the response variable was log-transformed.