Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 11;8:1160. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01160

Table 2.

Correlation between each variable (Study 1).

M SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 Citation rate GS 252.37 390.19 1
2 Citation rate WoS 114.20 165.16 0.99 1
3 Effect size r 0.46 0.69 0.12 0.14 1
4 p-value 0.12 0.15 -0.10 -0.11 -0.64 1
5 Sample size 61.00 44.96 0.08 0.08 0 -0.22 1
6 Free access 0.66 0.48 0.40 0.40 0.18 -0.1 -0.02 1
7 Journal impact factor 3.21 1.26 0.46 0.50 0.08 -0.05 -0.07 0.23 1
8 Number of authors 2.92 1.35 0.00 0.01 0.25 -0.09 -0.08 0.17 -0.01 1
9 Position of 1st letter 12.09 6.82 -0.40 -0.41 0.10 -0.02 0.05 0.05 -0.15 0.23 1
10 Year of publication 2004.66 5.19 0.03 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.05 -0.03 -0.08 -0.19 0.17

In order to avoid the focus on statistically significant results based on the NHST (e.g., Salsburg, 1985; Masicampo and Lalande, 2012), the usual significance asterisks has been omitted in the table. Every |r| > 0.165 is significant on p < 0.05, |r| > 0.217 on p < 0.01 and every |r| > 0.275 on p < 0.001, two-tailed. N = 140. All variables are RIN transformed except ‘Free access’ before correlations were computed. GS, Google Scholar; WoS, Web of Science; Free availability, 1: Articles is freely available, 0: is not; position of 1st letter: Position of the first letter of the surname of the first author in the alphabet.