Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 1;6(7):1738–1751. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1107

Table 2.

Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis of the proteins found to be significantly different in PC vs. CP OPLS‐DA analysis and pFDR vs. VIP analysis

Protein Name AUC Lower Upper P Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%)
Alpha‐1B‐glycoprotein 0.920 0.827 1.000 0.000 82 92
Prothrombin 0.917 0.818 1.000 0.000 86 83
Protein AMBP 0.951 0.863 1.000 0.000 91 100
Inter‐alpha‐trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H2 0.947 0.871 1.000 0.000 91 100
V‐type proton ATPase subunit B, kidney isoform 0.939 0.847 1.000 0.000 91 100
Hemopexin 0.886 0.758 1.000 0.000 86 92
Pigment epithelium‐derived factor 0.928 0.837 1.000 0.000 86 92
Hepatocyte growth factor‐like protein 0.928 1.000 0.828 0.000 100 83
Inter‐alpha‐trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H1 0.917 0.825 1.000 0.000 77 100
Serum amyloid P‐component 0.883 0.761 1.000 0.000 95 75
Complement C3 0.909 0.805 1.000 0.000 82 92
Acylglycerol kinase, mitochondrial 0.875 0.756 0.994 0.000 82 83
Inter‐alpha‐trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H3 0.848 0.690 1.000 0.001 86 83
Leucine‐rich repeat‐containing protein 9 0.894 0.788 1.000 0.000 77 100
Complement factor I 0.902 0.797 1.000 0.000 91 83
Beta‐2‐glycoprotein 1 0.883 0.772 0.993 0.000 68 100
Plasma protease C1 inhibitor 0.905 0.800 1.000 0.000 86 92
Afamin 0.894 0.777 1.000 0.000 86 92
Lipoxygenase homology domain‐containing protein 1 0.894 1.000 0.788 0.000 95 67
Protocadherin alpha‐13 0.841 0.703 0.978 0.001 86 83

Area under the curve values (AUC), lower and upper confidence values, P value, sensitivity and specificity are given in the table.