Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 26;5(6):e86. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7863

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of immediate intervention and delayed intervention participants.

Characteristics All
(N=34)
Immediate intervention
(n=17)
Delayed intervention
(n=17)
P valuea
Women, n (%) 28 (82) 14 (82) 14 (82) N/Ab
Age in years, mean (SD) 55.5 (8.6) 52.3 (9.7) 58.7 (6.0) .03
Marital status, n (%)


.40

Married or common law 25 (74) 11 (65) 14 (82)

Separated or divorced 5 (15) 4 (24) 1 (6)

Widowed, never married, or other 4 (12) 2 (12) 2 (12)
Gross annual household income in Can $, n (%)

.52

≤12,000 2 (6) 1 (6) 1 (6)

12,001-24,000 1 (3) 0 1 (6)

24,001-40,000 2 (6) 0 2 (12)

40,001-60,000 5 (15) 4 (24) 1 (6)

60,001-80,000 0 0 0

80,001-100,000 3 (9) 2 (12) 1 (6)

>100,000 14 (41) 7 (41) 7 (41)

No answer 7 (21) 3 (18) 4 (24)
OAc diagnosis, n (%)


.73

Yes 20 (59) 11 (65) 9 (53)

No, but met the “likely OA” criteria 14 (41) 6 (35) 8 (47)
“In general, would you say your health is…”, n (%) .15

Excellent 6 (18) 5 (29) 1 (6)

Very good 11 (32) 5 (29) 6 (35)

Good 13 (38) 4 (26) 9 (53)

Fair 4 (12) 3 (18) 1 (6)

Poor 0 0 0
“Compared with 1 year ago, how would you rate your health in general now?”, n (%) .25

Much better 1 (3) 1 (6) 0

Somewhat better 1 (3) 0 1 (6)

About the same 27 (79) 15 (88) 12 (71)

Somewhat worse 5 (15) 1 (6) 4 (24)

Much worse 0 0 0
Number of comorbid conditions, median (25th; 75th percentile) 2.5 (2.0; 4.0) 3.0 (2.0; 4.0) 2.0 (2.0; 3.0) 0.53
Body mass index in kg/m2, mean (SD) 27.2 (4.7) 29.1 (4.5) 25.4 (4.2) 0.02

aP values were based on exact chi-square tests for categorical variables (nonmissing data), and 2-sample t tests for continuous variables.

bN/A: not applicable.

cOA: osteoarthritis.