Table 3.

Predictors of pedestrian–MVC locations, national road versus local road, Cluj County, Romania, 2010

	Model 1—child-related cause (N=55)		Model 2—moving violation (N=217)		Model 3—jaywalking or other pedestrian action (N=217)
	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI
Characteristic Pedestrian age
0–12	0.23	0.06 to 0.97	0.36	0.13 to 0.97	0.35	0.13 to 0.95
13–18	ref	ref	2.22	0.67 to 7.38	2.19	0.66 to 7.22
19–44			1.47	0.64 to 3.37	1.49	0.66 to 3.40
45–64			ref	ref	ref	ref
65–93			0.65	0.27 to 1.56	0.64	0.27 to 1.54
Shoulder
Yes	0.31	0.08 to 1.22	2.80	1.52 to 5.17	2.72	1.49 to 4.99
No	ref	ref	ref	ref	ref	ref
Marked pedestrian crossing
Yes	0.21	0.05 to 0.99
No	ref	ref
Child-related cause
Yes	0.44	0.08 to 2.51
No	ref	ref
Moving violation by motor vehicle
Yes			1.93	1.07 to 3.49
No			ref	ref
Jaywalking or other pedestrian action
Yes					0.61	0.34 to 1.11
No					ref	ref

Model 1 Adj R²=0.38, model 2 Adj R²=0.18, model 3 Adj R²=0.17. (1) Outcome=national road versus local road. (2) Pedestrian crossing was not included in models 2 or 3 because it is highly correlated with both moving violation and jaywalking.

Shaded area indicates those variables are not in those models.