Table 1.
Simulation results of setting 1
Method | RE | EE | Sensitivity | Specificity | cPVE | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1stPC | 2ndPC | 1stPC | 2ndPC | 1stPC | 2ndPC | |||
P = 500 | ||||||||
PCA | 31 (9e-1) | 1.1 (3e-2) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.3e-2 (2e-3) | 8.2e-2 (2e-3) |
SPCA | 34 (3) | 1.2 (1e-1) | 0.54 | 0.50 | 0.95 | 0.90 | 2.0e-2 (2e-3) | 4.0e-2 (4e-3) |
SPC | 16 (8) | 0.57 (3e-1) | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.98 | 1.0 | 2.8e-2 (3e-3) | 5.5e-2 (6e-3) |
Biological information correctly specified | ||||||||
Fused sPCA | 25 (6) | 0.90 (2e-1) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 2.9e-2 (4e-3) | 5.1e-2 (7e-3) |
Grouped sPCA | 8.0 (6) | 0.29 (2e-1) | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.97 | 1.0 | 3.2e-2 (2e-3) | 6.0e-2 (3e-3) |
Biological information randomly specified | ||||||||
Fused sPCA | 32 (4) | 1.1 (2e-1) | 0.95 | 1.0 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 3.0e-2 (4e-3) | 5.2e-2 (7e-3) |
Grouped sPCA | 9.1 (6) | 0.33 (2e-1) | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.97 | 1.0 | 3.2e-2 (2e-3) | 5.9e-2 (3e-3) |
P = 10,000 | ||||||||
PCA | 112 (3) | 1.3 (2e-2) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.6e-2 (1e-3) | 5.0e-2 (1e-3) |
SPCA | 160 (4) | 1.9 (3e-2) | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 2.3e-3 (5e-4) | 4.5e-3 (7e-4) |
SPC | 172 (4) | 2.0 (8e-3) | 0.01 | 0.01 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.7e-4 (1e-4) | 3.4e-4 (3e-4) |
Biological information correctly specified | ||||||||
Fused sPCA | 81 (50) | 0.94 (0.5) | 0.62 | 0.55 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.2e-2 (6e-3) | 2.2e-2 (1e-2) |
Grouped sPCA | 54 (40) | 0.62 (0.4) | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.99 | 1.0 | 1.4e-2 (3e-3) | 2.6e-2 (6e-3) |
Biological information randomly specified | ||||||||
Fused sPCA | 140 (30) | 1.6 (0.4) | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 8.9e-3 (5e-3) | 1.6e-2 (1e-2) |
Grouped sPCA | 58 (40) | 0.67 (0.5) | 0.59 | 0.55 | 0.99 | 1.0 | 1.4e-2 (3e-3) | 2.6e-2 (7e-2) |
Cumulative proportions of variance explained by true PCs are 0.03 for PC 1 and 0.06 for PC 1 and 2. P, number of variables. RE, reconstruction error, defined as , where A=(α 1 α 2). EE, estimation error, defined as . cPVE, proportions of cumulative variation explained. ·(·), mean(std)