Table 5.
Change in lunch type and change in dietary intakes between 10 and 14 years of age, SPEEDY study, Norfolk, UK, 2007 to 2011.
| Consumption during school hours |
Total daily consumption |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Move from non-school to school lunch (n = 35) vs maintain non-school lunch (n = 225) |
Move from school to non-school lunch (n = 42) vs maintain school lunch (n = 30) |
Move from non-school to school lunch (n = 35) vs maintain non-school lunch (n = 225) |
Move from school to non-school lunch (n = 42) vs maintain school lunch (n = 30) |
|
| beta (SE) | beta (SE) | beta (SE) | beta (SE) | |
| Total energy (kJ) | −270.85 (181.19) | 143.35 (266.74) | −273 (161.28) | 313.97 (206.37) |
| %E from protein | 1.94 (0.76)* | −2.18 (1.43) | 0.36 (0.44) | −0.39 (0.63) |
| %E from carbohydrates | −1.14 (1.93) | 1.78 (2.38) | −0.53 (0.99) | −0.86 (1.5) |
| %E from sugars | −4.07 (2.42) | 2.78 (2.25) | −2.11 (1.28) | −1.37 (1.57) |
| %E from fat | −1.23 (1.77) | 0.10 (2.36) | 0.09 (0.94) | 1.28 (1.38) |
| %E from saturated fatty acids | −0.79 (0.99) | −0.03 (1.31) | −0.47 (0.49) | 0.13 (0.68) |
| NSPs (g/MJ) | −0.12 (0.17) | 0.43 (0.15)** | 0.05 (0.08) | 0.06 (0.1) |
| Sodium (mg/MJ) | 20.88 (20.51) | 38.24 (33.24) | 11.08 (11.29) | 3.92 (18.53) |
| Confectionery (g) | −0.47 (3.00) | 1.86 (3.93) | −2.07 (4.19) | 7.85 (4.97) |
| Savoury snacks (g) | −8.32 (2.03)*** | 6.07 (2.95)* | −6.21 (2.47)* | 8.84 (4.72) |
| SSBs (g) | −2.31 (17.98) | 12.56 (19.72) | −10.82 (36.61) | 1.90 (38.8) |
| Fruits (g) | −25.16 (11.02)* | 27.16 (11.33)* | −7.87 (14.98) | 11.99 (20.47) |
| Vegetables (g) | −4.48 (3.18) | 15.21 (6.12)* | −4.13 (7.98) | 6.04 (12.05) |
| Fries (g) | 12.80 (4.01)** | −14.27 (5.52)* | 11.01 (7.58) | −4.17 (10.77) |
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Abbreviations: SE = standard error, kJ = kilojoules, %E = percentage total energy intake, MJ = megajoule total energy intake.
Note: beta is the difference in each outcome between those who have moved between non-school lunch and school lunch and those who have continued consuming the same lunch type, adjusted for sex, age, parental education level, dietary misreporting at both time points, food/nutrient consumption at baseline and with school attended included as a level 2 variable.