Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 2;40(2):293–302. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2017.3009

Table II.

Association between Lewis(y) antigen and MUC1 expression, expression intensity and pathological features in ovarian cancer.

Features Case Lewis(y)
MUC1
Positive cases Rate (%) P-value MOD P-value Positive cases Rate (%) P-value MOD P-value
FIGO stage
 I–II 39 33 84.62 >0.05 0.438±0.089 <0.05 31 79.49 >0.05 0.421±0.097 <0.05
 III–IV 21 20 95.24 0.501±0.098 21 100 0.510±0.083
Differentiation level
 High 21 17 80.95 >0.05 0.431±0.089 <0.05a 18 85.71 >0.05 0.440±0.095 <0.05a
 Moderate 21 18 85.71 0.465±0.092 >0.05b 17 80.95 0.456±0.081 >0.05b
 Poor 18 18 100 0.493±0.104 <0.05c 17 94.44 0.476±0.092 <0.05c
Lymphatic metastasis
 No 48 41 85.42 >0.05 0.457±0.094 >0.05 42 87.5 >0.05 0.451±0.098 >0.05
 Yes 12 12 100 0.489±0.077 10 83.33 0.485±0.069
a

Compared with the low differentiation group;

b

compared with the low and high differentiation groups;

c

compared with the high differentiation group.