Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 8;102(7):2575–2583. doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-3529

Table 2.

Evaluation of Effect Modification for the Thyroid Cancer Radiation Dose Response, Including Numbers of Radiation-Exposed Cases and Fitted RR at 0.2 Gy Under an Additive Adjustment for Treatment With Chemotherapy

Modifier Data With Doses <0.2 Gy
Data With Doses <0.1 Gy
Cases RR0.2 Gya θ Cases RR0.2Gya θ
None 252 3.2 2.84 184 2.9 2.17
Sex
 Male 58 4.2 2.93 44 5.0 2.31
 Female 194 3.0 140 2.4
P valueb 0.35 0.15
Age at exposure (y)
 <1 40 1.6 3.49 30 0.4 2.77
 1–4 64 4.2 31 2.9
 5–9 84 3.9 71 3.9
 10–14 42 3.5 35 3.7
 15–19 22 1.6 17 0.6
P valuec 0.01 0.05
Attained age (y)
 <20 17 9.4 3.72 10 7.5 2.49
 20–29 43 5.5 25 4.1
 30–39 48 2.6 33 2.0
 40–49 60 2.2 48 2.6
 50–59 62 3.1 52 3.2
 60+ 22 2.5 16 1.9
P valuec 0.01 0.13
Time since exposure (y)
 <20 37 5.3 3.16 22 4.2 2.41
 20–29 49 3.5 36 3.5
 30–34 33 3.4 22 1.7
 35–39 33 3.3 22 2.3
 40–44 36 2.4 28 2.2
 45+ 64 2.3 54 3.2
P valuec 0.02 0.26
Number of treatmentsd
 1 226 3.5 2.80 170 3.4 2.13
 ≥2 20 2.4 8 0.4
P valueb 0.25 0.25

Pooled data limited to doses <0.2 Gy or <0.1 Gy.

Fitted RRs from a linear model in radiation dose with an additive effect for chemotherapy treatment, c, RR(d,xt)=1+β d+ θ c. Models adjusted for study, sex, age, and study-specific factors (see text). For modifiers, (j βj zj d) replaced βd where zj was an indicator variable for category j and βj was a linear parameter. There were 142 with nonexposed cases. For <0.2 Gy and <0.1 Gy, β estimates with 95% CI were 11.1 (6.6, 19.7) and 9.6 (3.7, 17.0), respectively.

a

Fitted RR at 0.2 Gy.

b

P value for likelihood ratio test of no variation based on a binary modifier.

c

P value for likelihood ratio test of no variation based on continuous modifier.

d

The definition of fractionation, which involved time between fractions, dose per fraction, and reason, varied by study. One treatment included all dose fractions received within 6 months in most studies and within 1 year for the Tinea Capitis Study.