Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 3;10:3261–3276. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S135593

Table 4.

Quality assessment of included studies according to NOS

Studies
Selection
Comparability
Outcome
Total
First author Year A B C D E F G H score
Kjellman et al1 2003 * * * * * * 6
Feng and Wang62 2015 * * * * * * 6
Ito et al12 2010 * * * * * * 6
Jovanovic et al32 2015 * * * * * * 6
Gnemmi et al14 2014 * * * * * * * 7
Miyauchi et al22 2013 * * * * * 5
Chen et al20 2011 * * * * * * 6
Wang et al33 1996 * * * * * * 6
Tisell et al26 2003 * * * * * * 6

Notes: A: representative of the exposed cohort; B: selection of the nonexposed cohort; C: ascertainment of exposure; D: demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at the start of study; E: comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis; F: assessment of outcome; G: adequacy of follow-up for outcomes to occur (≥2 years or outcomes occurred in all patients); H: adequacy of follow-up of cohorts (follow-up rate ≥75%).

Abbreviation: NOS, Newcastle–Ottawa scale.