Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 May;92(5):726–733. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.01.019

Table 1.

Population characteristics and rate and odds of MT-sDNA screening (compared to colonoscopy) by age, sex, race, and prior CRC screening

N, (%) Colonoscopy
N (%)
MT-sDNA
N (%)
Odds of MT-sDNA
OR (95% CI)2
Total N=27,147 2,193 (8.08) 974 (3.59)
Age <.0011 <.0011 .0022
 50–54 7,294 (26.9) 739 (10.13) 346 (4.74) Ref
 55–59 7,238 (26.7) 387 (5.35) 118 (1.63) 0.60 (0.47, 0.79)
 60–64 5,514 (20.3) 489 (8.87) 225 (4.08) 0.95 (0.77, 1.16)
 65–69 4,002 (14.7) 331 (8.27) 164 (4.1) 0.99 (0.78, 1.24)
 70–75 3,099 (11.4) 247 (7.97) 121 (3.9) 0.94 (0.73, 1.22)
Sex .421 <.0011 <.0012
 Males 12,662 (46.6) 1,041 (8.22) 357 (2.82) Ref
 Females 14,485 (53.4) 1,152 (7.95) 617 (4.26) 1.56 (1.33, 1.82)
Race/Ethnicity <.0011 <.0011 .032
 White 23,028 (84.8) 1,929 (8.38) 892 (3.87) Ref
 Black 957 (3.5) 60 (6.27) 13 (1.47) 0.43 (0.23, 0.82)
 Asian 1,063 (3.9) 70 (6.59) 27 (2.54) 0.85 (0.54, 1.35)
 Hispanic 1,212 (4.5) 82 (6.77) 30 (2.48) 0.80 (0.52, 1.23)
 Other/Unknown 887 (1.0) 52 (5.86) 12 (1.25) 0.58 (0.31, 1.08)
Prior CRC Screening .551 <.0011 <.0012
 Yes 321 (1.2) 23 (7.17) 53 (16.51) Ref
 No 26,826 (98.8) 2,170 (8.09) 921 (3.43) 0.17 (0.10, 0.28)
1

Chi-square P-value comparing screening rates across categories of the given characteristic separately for colonoscopy and MT-sDNA

2

Odds ratio and 95% confidence interval from multiple logistic regression analysis. The dependent variable for this analysis was screening method and all characteristics listed in the table were included as explanatory variables. Odds ratios>1 indicate an increased likelihood of screening with MT- sDNA. P-value represents Type 3 analysis of the effect across categories of the given characteristic

Abbreviations: CI, Confidence Interval; CRC, Colorectal Cancer; MT-sDNA, Multi-Target Stool Deoxyribonucleic Acid; OR, Odds Ratio