Table 2.
Panel A: Predicting Number of High-Cost Sectors (range 0–8) |
Univariate Models | Multivariate Models | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRR | IRR 95% CI | IRR | IRR 95% CI | |||||
Number of High-Cost Sectors * | ||||||||
Childhood Low SES | 1.33 | (1.25, 1.42) | 1.21 | (1.13, 1.29) | ||||
Child Maltreatment | 1.23 | (1.17, 1.30) | 1.13 | (1.07, 1.20) | ||||
Childhood Low IQ | 1.26 | (1.18, 1.34) | 1.05 | (0.98, 1.13) | ||||
Childhood Low Self-Control | 1.32 | (1.25, 1.40) | 1.18 | (1.11, 1.26) | ||||
Panel B: Predicting the Multiple-High-Cost Sector |
RR | RR 95% CI | AUC | AUC 95% CI | RR | RR 95% CI | AUC | AUC 95% CI |
0 vs 1 High-Cost Sectors * | 0.67 | (0.62, 0.72) | ||||||
Childhood Low SES | 1.20 | (1.08, 1.32) | 0.66 | (0.61, 0.71) | 1.17 | (1.06, 1.30) | ||
Child Maltreatment | 1.12 | (1.02, 1.22) | 0.64 | (0.59, 0.69) | 1.08 | (0.98, 1.18) | ||
Childhood Low IQ | 1.07 | (0.97, 1.18) | 0.62 | (0.57, 0.67) | 0.97 | (0.88, 1.08) | ||
Childhood Low Self-Control | 1.16 | (1.06, 1.27) | 0.65 | (0.60, 0.70) | 1.10 | (0.99, 1.21) | ||
0 vs 2 High-Cost Sectors * | 0.73 | (0.69, 0.78) | ||||||
Childhood Low SES | 1.23 | (1.10, 1.37) | 0.69 | (0.64, 0.74) | 1.12 | (1.00, 1.26) | ||
Child Maltreatment | 1.07 | (0.96, 1.19) | 0.66 | (0.61, 0.71) | 1.00 | (0.89, 1.12) | ||
Childhood Low IQ | 1.33 | (1.20, 1.48) | 0.71 | (0.67, 0.76) | 1.16 | (1.01, 1.32) | ||
Childhood Low Self-Control | 1.29 | (1.19, 1.39) | 0.72 | (0.68, 0.77) | 1.19 | (1.07, 1.31) | ||
0 vs 3+ High-Cost Sectors = Multiple-High-Cost * | 0.87 | (0.84, 0.90) | ||||||
Childhood Low SES | 1.49 | (1.35, 1.64) | 0.83 | (0.79, 0.86) | 1.31 | (1.18, 1.45) | ||
Child Maltreatment | 1.28 | (1.19, 1.37) | 0.8 | (0.76, 0.84) | 1.14 | (1.05, 1.23) | ||
Childhood Low IQ | 1.35 | (1.24, 1.47) | 0.81 | (0.77, 0.85) | 1.08 | (0.98, 1.20) | ||
Childhood Low Self-Control | 1.38 | (1.27, 1.49) | 0.84 | (0.80, 0.87) | 1.17 | (1.07, 1.29) |
Childhood socioeconomic status (SES), IQ, and self-control are standardized z-scores (M = 0, SD = 1); childhood maltreatment is coded as 0 = none, 1 = probable, 2 = definite maltreatment. All models control for sex. Prediction was the same when men and women were analyzed separately (see Supplemental materials for details).
Time spent outside New Zealand is added as a covariate in analyses that use New Zealand administrative data.
RR = Risk Ratio; IRR = Incidence Rate Ratio; AUC = Area Under the Curve; CI = Confidence Interval