Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 11.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Hum Behav. 2016 Dec 12;1:0005. doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0005

Table 3.

Variation in children’s age-3 brain health predicted which children belonged to high-cost economic-burden groups, 35 years later. Panel A shows that variation in age-3 brain health predicted who was more likely to belong to a high-cost group in adulthood, in each of 8 different sectors. Panel B shows that age-3 brain health predicted the number of high-cost groups (ranging from 0–8) to which each cohort member belonged. Panel C shows that age-3 brain health differentiated cohort members who became, as adults, members of the multiple-high-cost segment of their society.

Panel A: Predicting High-Cost in Each of 8
Different Sectors
RR RR 95% CI AUC AUC 95% CI
Social Welfare * 1.38 (1.25, 1.53) 0.73 (0.69, 0.77)
Fatherless Children 1.22 (1.07, 1.38) 0.61 (0.56, 0.66)
Smoking 1.25 (1.12, 1.40) 0.60 (0.55, 0.64)
Excess obese kilograms 1.15 (1.02, 1.29) 0.56 (0.52, 0.61)
Hospital Stays * 1.18 (1.05, 1.34) 0.72 (0.68, 0.76)
Prescription Fills * 1.23 (1.10, 1.38) 0.73 (0.69, 0.76)
Injury Claims * 1.10 (0.99, 1.23) 0.74 (0.70, 0.77)
Crime* 1.19 (1.09, 1.29) 0.72 (0.68, 0.75)
Panel B: Predicting Number of High-Cost Sectors
(range 0–8)
IRR IRR 95% CI
Number of High-Cost Sectors * 1.20 (1.13, 1.27)    
Panel C: Predicting the Multiple-High-Cost Sector RR RR 95% CI AUC AUC 95% CI
0 vs. 1 High-Cost Sectors * 1.03 (0.94, 1.14) 0.62 (0.57, 0.67)
0 vs. 2 High-Cost Sectors * 1.17 (1.07, 1.28) 0.68 (0.63, 0.73)
0 vs. 3+ High-Cost Sectors * 1.26 (1.17, 1.36) 0.79 (0.75, 0.83)

All models control for sex. Prediction was the same when men and women were analyzed separately (see Supplemental materials for details).

*

Time spent outside New Zealand is added as a covariate in analyses that use New Zealand administrative data.

RR = Risk Ratio; IRR = Incidence Rate Ratio; AUC = Area Under the Curve; CI = Confidence Interval