Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 11;7:5058. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05520-9

Table 1.

Statistical comparisons of seed-based functional connectivity during gratitude and resentment interventions.

Functional connectivity Target region MNI coordinate, mm Nvox Zmax
Seed x y z
Contrast of [during Gratitude > during Resentment]
 Posterior cingulate cortex Rt. Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex 22 34 50 1799 6.59
Lt. Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex −26 28 50 179 5.91
Lt. Angular gyrus −38 −62 36 284 6.3
Rt. Angular gyrus 56 −64 28 701 5.46
Rt. Precuneus 12 −52 28 2046 7.62
Lt. Middle temporal gyrus −62 −8 −24 136 5.99
 Ventromedial prefrontal cortex Lt. Posterior cingulate cortex −4 −26 32 398 4.81
Rt. Posterior cingulate cortex 2 −52 40 137 4.94
Rt. Temporoparietal junction 54 −60 22 99 4.77
Lt. Amygdala not significant
Rt. Amygdala not significant
Lt. Nucleus accumbens not significant
Rt. Nucleus accumbens not significant
Contrast of [during Gratitude < during Resentment]
 Posterior cingulate cortex Rt. Frontopolar prefrontal cortex 34 50 32 194 −6.15
Rt. Ventrolateral prefrontal cortex 60 20 4 121 −5.4
Rt. Supramarginal gyrus 64 −30 36 120 −5.6
Ventromedial prefrontal cortex Rt. Premotor cortex 28 4 66 134 −5.62
Lt. Cerebellum −6 −72 −24 230 −6
Lt. Amygdala not significant
Rt. Amygdala not significant
Lt. Nucleus accumbens not significant
Rt. Nucleus accumbens not significant

Significant clusters were obtained at family-wise error rate corrected P < 0.05.

Abbreviation: Lt, left; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; Nvox, number of contiguous voxels; Rt, right; Zmax, maximum z-value within the cluster.