Table 2. Assessment of methodological quality of the selected papers.
Item | Yes | No | NA |
---|---|---|---|
Was an a priori design provided? | 27/27 | ||
Was there duplicate study selection and data extraction? | 27/27 | ||
Was a comprehensive literature search performed? | 27/27 | ||
Was the status of publication (i.e., grey literature) used as an inclusion criterion? | 27/27 | ||
Was a list of studies (included and excluded) provided? | 27/27 | ||
Were the characteristics of the included studies provided? | 27/27 | ||
Was the scientific quality of the included studies assessed and documented? | 27/27 | ||
Was the scientific quality of the included studies used appropriately in formulating conclusions? | 27/27 | ||
Were the methods used to combine the findings of studies appropriate? | 27/27 | ||
Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed? | 27/27 | ||
Was the conflict of interest stated? | 7/27 | 20/27 |
NA, not applicable.