Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun;9(6):1615–1623. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.05.79

Table 2. Assessment of methodological quality of the selected papers.

Item Yes No NA
Was an a priori design provided? 27/27
Was there duplicate study selection and data extraction? 27/27
Was a comprehensive literature search performed? 27/27
Was the status of publication (i.e., grey literature) used as an inclusion criterion? 27/27
Was a list of studies (included and excluded) provided? 27/27
Were the characteristics of the included studies provided? 27/27
Was the scientific quality of the included studies assessed and documented? 27/27
Was the scientific quality of the included studies used appropriately in formulating conclusions? 27/27
Were the methods used to combine the findings of studies appropriate? 27/27
Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed? 27/27
Was the conflict of interest stated? 7/27 20/27

NA, not applicable.