Table 5. Negative results from studies of targeted agents in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Therapy | Study result | Study citation |
---|---|---|
Brivanib vs. sorafenib | Brivanib did not meet noninferiority criteria and was less well-tolerated | Johnson PJ, et al. J Clin Oncol 2013 |
Linifanib vs. sorafenib | Linifanib did not meet noninferiority OS boundaries and safety results favored sorafenib | Cainap C, et al. J Clin Oncol 2015 |
Vandetanib vs. sorafenib | Vandetanib demonstrated limited clinical activity | Hsu C, et al. J Hepatol 2012 |
Sunitinib | Pronounced toxicities and only modest antitumor activity in HCC | Faivre S, et al. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:794-800; Zhu AX, et al. J Clin Oncol 2009 |
Sorafenib with erlotinib | Combination did not improve OS | Zhu AX, et al. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:559-566 |
Sorafenib with tigatuzumab | Sorafenib with tigatuzumab did not improve TTP | Cheng AL, et al. J Hepatol 2015 |
Everolimus vs. placebo after sorafenib failure | Did not improve OS | Zhu AX, et al. JAMA 2014 |
Ramucirumab vs. placebo after sorafenib failure | Did not improve OS | Zhu AX, et al. Lancet Oncol 2015 |
Axitinib vs. placebo after sorafenib failure | Did not improve OS | Kang YK, et al. Ann Oncol 2015 |
OS, overall survival; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; TTP, time to progression.