Table 5.
Number of people, number of pupae, and temephos presence in surveys in Managua control sites between 2005 and 2013
| Survey date | Temephos observed in any container | Temephos not observed in any container | OR (95% CI)a | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. people | No. pupae (PPP) | No. people | No. pupae (PPP) | ||
| Oct 2005 | 2100 | 666 (0.3) | 13,519 | 4296 (0.3) | 1.18 (0.85–1.64) |
| Oct 2006 | 3736 | 955 (0.3) | 11,825 | 2351 (0.2) | 1.17 (0.83–1.66) |
| Oct 2007 | 3997 | 1271 (0.3) | 16,517 | 4743 (0.3) | 1.01 (0.74–1.37) |
| Jan 2011 | 4378 | 404 (0.1) | 16,592 | 1751 (0.1) | 1.31 (0.97–1.75) |
| Aug 2012 | 7321 | 2896 (0.7) | 14,345 | 4680 (0.3) | 1.36 (1.11–1.67) |
| Jan 2013 | 5086 | 1216 (0.2) | 16,052 | 1879 (0.1) | 1.83 (1.41–2.37) |
We dichotomised the pupae per person (PPP) variable into households with above and below the mean PPP
OR of >1.0 indicates that households with temephos present were more likely to have a positive entomological indicator; italic font indicates the association was significant at the 5% level
aOdds ratio and 95% confidence intervals from GLMM, with cluster as random effect