Table 1.
Labeling methods.
Method | Ion exchanger | Elution solution ion exchanger | Buffer | Advantages/limitations | References | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Fractional elution | _ | _ | HEPES | (+) No preconcentration is required | 4 |
(−) Only ∼80% of activity is available for labeling | ||||||
(−) Final purification is required | ||||||
(−) The final product contains ethanol | ||||||
2 | Anionic method | SAX | ∼0.4 ml water | HEPES | (+) The method delivers 68Ga in high chemical purity | 5 |
(−) Handling with concentrated HCl is necessary | ||||||
(−) Final purification is required | ||||||
(−) The final product contains ethanol | ||||||
3 | Cationic method (acetone) | SCX | 0.5 ml of acetone/HCl | HEPES | (+) The method is well established | 6 |
(−) Final purification is required | ||||||
(−) The final product contains ethanol and other side products | ||||||
(±) The method is licensed for Eckert & Ziegler | ||||||
4 | Cationic method (ethanol) | SCX | 1 ml of ethanol/HCl | HEPES, ammonium acetate | (+) Because of the low concentration of foreign ions in the reaction mixture, high specific activities are achievable | 8–10 |
(−) The final product contains ethanol | ||||||
(±) The method is licensed for Eckert & Ziegler | ||||||
5 | Combined cationic-anionic method | (1) SCX(2) SAX | (1) 0.4 ml of 4 M HCl(2) ∼0.4 ml of water | HEPES | (+) Because of the low concentration of foreign ions in the reaction mixture, high specific activities are achievable | 11,12 |
(−) Handling of 7 M HCl is required | ||||||
(−) The final product contains ethanol | ||||||
(−) Two steps of postprocessing 68Ga eluate are needed | ||||||
6 | Cationic method (NaCl) | SCX | 0.5 ml of 5 M NaCl/0.1 M HCl | Ammonium acetate, sodium acetate | (+) No organic solvents are found in the final product | 13,14 |
(+) High specific activities are routinely achievable | ||||||
(±) The reaction mixture usually contains 1 M sodium chloride, which could be disadvantageous for NaCl-sensitive peptides |