Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 1;8(4):1577–1589. doi: 10.3390/ma8041577

Table 5.

Pairwise comparison (adjustment: Tukey-Kramer) of subgroups regarding their response variables (bending moment and fracture load).

Comparison Bending moment Fracture load
adj. p-value Significance adj. p-value Significance
C0 : C5 0.994 not significant 0.9981 not significant
C0 : C10 0.5322 not significant 0.6137 not significant
C0 : N0 0.9945 not significant 0.9983 not significant
C0 : N5 0.0728 not significant 0.0732 not significant
C0 : N10 0.8497 not significant 0.9001 not significant
C5 : C10 0.8493 not significant 0.8537 not significant
C5 : N0 1.0 not significant 1.0 not significant
C5 : N5 0.2239 not significant 0.1802 not significant
C5 : N10 0.9886 not significant 0.989 not significant
C10 : N0 0.8439 not significant 0.8485 not significant
C10 : N5 0.8727 not significant 0.8146 not significant
C10 : N10 0.9939 not significant 0.9942 not significant
N0 : N5 0.2192 not significant 0.1761 not significant
N0 : N10 0.9876 not significant 0.9881 not significant
N5 : N10 0.5658 not significant 0.4894 not significant