Table 5. Associations between real election outcomes and face-based inferences of corruption.
Average Agreement | Cross-country Comparison | ||
---|---|---|---|
U.S. Electiona | Korean Electionb | U.S—Koreanc | |
All participants (N = 80) | 49.18% | 52.21% | -3.03% |
SD | 9.47% | 8.43% | t (79) = -2.07 |
95% CI | [47.42%, Inf) | [50.64%, Inf) | [-5.94%, -0.11%] |
Caucasian participants (N = 40) | 47.50% | 52.46% | -4.96% |
SD | 10.28% | 8.72% | t (39) = -2.29 |
95% CI | [44.76%, Inf) | [50.14%, Inf) | [-9.33%, -0.59%] |
Korean participants (N = 40) | 50.86% | 51.95% | -1.09% |
SD | 8.38% | 8.24% | t (39) = -0.56 |
95% CI | [48.62%, Inf) | [49.76%, Inf) | [-5.05%, 2.86%] |
aAverage agreement between U.S. election outcomes and face-based inferences of corruption, and its one-sided t-test against chance level 50%.
bAverage agreement between Korean election outcomes and face-based inferences of corruption, and its one-sided t-test against chance level 50%.
cTwo-sided t-tests on the average agreement across U.S. and Korean elections.