Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 10;12(7):e0180999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180999

Table 1. Properties of new anti-RTB mAbs compared to 24B11 and SylH3.

mAb EC50 c Relative Kinetic Parameters a IC50 d Competition b
ka (1/Ms) kd (1/s) KD (M) SylH3 24B11
SylH3 2.5 2.20 x 105 8.06 x 10−6 3.67 x10-11 12 + -
24B11 5 2.67 x 105 1.51 x 10−5 5.64 x 10−11 1.2 - +
MH3 0.3 2.58 x 105 7.45 x 10−6 2.89 x10-11 1.6 - +
8A1 2.5 3.67 x 105 2.75 x 10−5 7.49 x10-11 3.3 - +
8B3 2.5 4.78 x 105 4.25 x 10−5 8.89 x10-11 27 + +
LF1 2.5 1.02 x 105 6.92 x 10−6 6.79 x10-11 27 - +
LC5 0.6 4.96 x 105 8.95 x 10−5 1.8 x10-10 - - -

a, apparent binding association (ka) and dissociation (kd) rate constants, as well as apparent equilibrium dissociation constants (KD), were determined by SPR using IgG molecules (not Fab fragments) and ricin toxin-coated GLC chips. The Langmuir model was used to analyze sensorgram results, as described in the Materials and Methods;

b, competition ELISAs are described in the Materials and Methods. The minus (-) symbol indicates that binding inhibition values were <10% of controls;

c As determined in the soluble ricin competition assay, described in Fig 3;

d, nM.