Table 1. Properties of new anti-RTB mAbs compared to 24B11 and SylH3.
mAb | EC50 c | Relative Kinetic Parameters a | IC50 d | Competition b | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ka (1/Ms) | kd (1/s) | KD (M) | SylH3 | 24B11 | |||
SylH3 | 2.5 | 2.20 x 105 | 8.06 x 10−6 | 3.67 x10-11 | 12 | + | - |
24B11 | 5 | 2.67 x 105 | 1.51 x 10−5 | 5.64 x 10−11 | 1.2 | - | + |
MH3 | 0.3 | 2.58 x 105 | 7.45 x 10−6 | 2.89 x10-11 | 1.6 | - | + |
8A1 | 2.5 | 3.67 x 105 | 2.75 x 10−5 | 7.49 x10-11 | 3.3 | - | + |
8B3 | 2.5 | 4.78 x 105 | 4.25 x 10−5 | 8.89 x10-11 | 27 | + | + |
LF1 | 2.5 | 1.02 x 105 | 6.92 x 10−6 | 6.79 x10-11 | 27 | - | + |
LC5 | 0.6 | 4.96 x 105 | 8.95 x 10−5 | 1.8 x10-10 | - | - | - |
a, apparent binding association (ka) and dissociation (kd) rate constants, as well as apparent equilibrium dissociation constants (KD), were determined by SPR using IgG molecules (not Fab fragments) and ricin toxin-coated GLC chips. The Langmuir model was used to analyze sensorgram results, as described in the Materials and Methods;
b, competition ELISAs are described in the Materials and Methods. The minus (-) symbol indicates that binding inhibition values were <10% of controls;
c As determined in the soluble ricin competition assay, described in Fig 3;
d, nM.