Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 10;12(7):e0180999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180999

Table 3. mAb passive protection studies in mouse models of systemic and mucosal ricin challenge.

Intraperitoneal Intranasal
Group Survivors p-valuea HR (95% CI)b Survivors p-valuea HR (95% CI) b
SylH3 9/10 0.0001 0.0022 (0.0002–0.0190) 8/10 0.0007 0.0280 (0.0054–0.1438)
24B11 3/5 0.0275 0.0096 (0.0018–0.0510) 1/5 0.3333 0.1457 (0.0415–0.5112)
MH3 7/10 0.0031 0.0098 (0.0029–0.0335) 2/10 0.4737 0.2227 (0.0791–0.6270)
8A1 1/5 0.3571 0.0577 (0.0157–0.2120) - - -
8B3 3/10 0.2105 0.0289 (0.0100–0.0836) - - -
LF1 0/10 >0.9999 0.1171 (0.0465–0.2951) - - -
LC5 0/5 >0.9999 0.1848 (0.0707–0.4828) 0/5 >0.9999 0.8302 (0.2803–2.4585)*
Control 0/9 - - 0/10 - -

a, p-values of Fisher’s exact tests comparing survival between individual experimental groups and the control group.

b, in all cases the Cox regression analysis indicated that mAb treatment was significantly beneficial (p-values <0.01) except for LC5 treatment in the intranasal group (p = 0.74).