Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 11;12(7):e0180151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180151

Table 3. Linear regression analysis between experimental and predicted local displacements for a tissue modulus Et = 12.0GPa.

Data are reported for predictions along the three Cartesian directions (X and Y in a transverse plane, Z in the axial direction) for the individual specimens and for pooled data.

Specimen ID Direction Nr. Comparison points (%) Slope Intercept [μm] R2 RMSE [μm] RMSE% MaxError [μm] CC1
S#1 UX 213 (98.6%) 1.05 0.33 0.99 1.35 3.99 6.36 0.99
UY 215 (99.5%) 0.98 1.12 0.97 1.64 5.25 7.42 0.98
UZ 215 (99.5%) 0.99 3.25 0.99 2.78 0.70 9.20 0.99
S#2 UX 205 (96.7%) 1.02 0.35 0.97 2.31 2.47 12.56 0.98
UY 209 (98.6%) 1.00 -1.96 0.99 2.31 1.25 9.48 0.99
UZ 207 (97.6%) 0.99 1.30 >0.99 2.93 1.11 10.79 1.00
S#3 UX 130 (99.2%) 0.71 -8.00 0.87 3.11 5.20 12.23 0.87
UY 130 (99.2%) 0.95 3.85 0.96 3.26 2.72 9.92 0.98
UZ 131 (100%) 1.05 -22.10 0.91 11.88 5.08 45.86 0.90
S#4 UX 226 (98.7%) 1.05 -1.06 0.98 1.25 3.19 4.50 0.99
UY 226 (98.7%) 1.09 -1.12 0.99 0.97 2.05 5.05 0.98
UZ 225 (98.3%) 0.99 4.56 0.99 1.69 0.57 9.33 0.99
Pooled UX 774 (98.2%) 0.99 1.04 0.99 2.55 2.74 12.56 1.00
UY 780 (99.0%) 0.98 1.46 >0.99 2.18 1.18 9.92 1.00
UZ 778 (98.7%) 1.04 -10.21 0.99 6.96 1.74 45.86 0.99

1Concordance Correlation Coefficient according to [43].