Skip to main content
. 2017 May 30;31(4):1081–1090. doi: 10.1111/jvim.14735

Table 2.

Summary of results of vector‐borne disease testing

Testing Modality Ehrlichia spp Anaplasma phagocytophilum Borrelia burgdorferi Rickettsia rickettsii Babesia spp Bartonella spp Mycoplasma spp
Acute Serology
n = 42
2 E. canis b (1 dog IFA+ and ELISA −) 1 1 0 0 1 B. vinsonii ssp. berkhoffi a N/A
Acute PCR
n = 42
2 E. canis b 0 N/A 0 1 B. vogeli 0 1 M. hematoparvum a
1 M. hemocanis a
Retest Acute PCR
n = 27 for Ehrlichia spp
n = 40 for Babesia spp
2 E. canis b 0 N/A 0 3 B. vogeli c
1 B. conradae a
0 N/A
Convalescent Serology
n = 27
2 E. canis b (Both dogs IFA + and ELISA +) 0 0 2 0 0 N/A
Convalescent PCR
n = 27
2 E. canis b
3 E. spp.
0 N/A 0 1 B. gibsoni 0 N/A

ELISA, Enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay; IFA, indirect immunofluorescent assay; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

a

1 dog coinfected with multiple agents.

b

The 2 E. canis positive results were detected in samples taken from the same 2 dogs.

c

1 of the 3 positive B. vogeli results was from the same dog PCR positive for B. vogeli on initial testing of an acute sample.